...
首页> 外文期刊>AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences >Comparison of test performance characteristics of MRI, MR angiography, and CT angiography in the diagnosis of carotid and vertebral artery dissection: a review of the medical literature.
【24h】

Comparison of test performance characteristics of MRI, MR angiography, and CT angiography in the diagnosis of carotid and vertebral artery dissection: a review of the medical literature.

机译:MRI,MR血管造影和CT血管造影在颈动脉和椎动脉夹层诊断中的测试性能特征比较:医学文献综述。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Initial assessment of patients with suspected dissection of the carotid or vertebral arteries typically is made by MRI, alone or in combination with MR angiography (MRA) or CT angiography (CTA). We reviewed the medical literature to determine, based on test performance characteristics such as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value, whether evidence could be found to support routine use of one imaging technique over the other for assessment of suspected dissection. CONCLUSION: Test characteristics for MR techniques such as MRI and MRA were relatively similar to those for CTA in diagnosis of carotid and vertebral artery dissection.
机译:目的:通常通过MRI,单独或与MR血管造影(MRA)或CT血管造影(CTA)结合,对怀疑有颈动脉或椎动脉夹层的患者进行初步评估。我们回顾了医学文献,根据敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值和阴性预测值等测试表现特征,确定是否可以找到证据来支持常规使用一种成像技术来评估可疑解剖。结论:在诊断颈动脉和椎动脉夹层时,MRI和MRA等MR技术的测试特征与CTA相对相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号