...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychology of religion and spirituality >Causal Relationship Between Religiosity and Value Priorities: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Investigations
【24h】

Causal Relationship Between Religiosity and Value Priorities: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Investigations

机译:宗教与价值优先事项的因果关系:横截面和纵向调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Religiosity and values are correlated. However, it is unclear whether it is because certain values predispose one to becoming and staying religious or whether religious persons are more likely to adopt those values. To clarify this ambiguity in directionality, we collected cross-sectional and longitudinal data from a Chinese sample (N = 3,248). We replicated previous findings that Christians and nonbelievers differ on all 10 values in Schwartz's model. Longitudinal analyses further showed that religious affiliation predicted increase in tradition and decline in self-direction, hedonism, and security about three years later. Making finer distinction within the Christian subsample, we showed that vertical faith maturity (relationship with the transcendence) was associated with all values except security, whereas horizontal faith maturity (charity toward fellow human beings) was associated with 7 values. Furthermore. longitudinal analyses revealed that vertical and horizontal faith maturity predicted 2-year changes in some values and in different directions: Vertical faith maturity predicted higher security and lower self-direction around two years later; horizontal faith maturity predicted higher self-direction and lower security around two years later. Evidence of relationship also goes in the opposite direction: Benevolence predicted positive changes in both vertical and horizontal faith maturity. Future assertions on the predictions of directional relationships between religiosity and values should specify the particular value and religiosity dimension.
机译:宗教和价值观是相关的。但是,目前尚不清楚是否是因为某些价值观倾向于成为和保持宗教或宗教人员是否更容易采用这些价值观。为了在方向性方面澄清这种模糊性,我们从中国样品收集了横截面和纵向数据(n = 3,248)。我们复制了先前的发现,即基督徒和非信e在Schwartz的模型中的所有10个价值观不同。纵向分析进一步表明,三年后,宗教联盟预测传统和自我,河床和安全性的下降。在基督教子征内进行更精细的区别,我们表明纵向信仰成熟(与超越)与除安全之外的所有价值相关,而水平信仰成熟(同胞符合人类的慈善机构)与7个价值有关。此外。纵向分析显示,垂直和横向信仰成熟度预测了某些价值观和不同方向的2年变化:垂直信仰成熟期预测两年后大约需要更高的安全性和较低的自身;横向信仰成熟度预测两年后左右的自我方向和较低的安全性。关系的证据也在相反方向:仁慈预测垂直和水平信仰成熟度的积极变化。关于宗教与价值观与价值观之间定向关系的预测的未来断言应指定特定的价值和宗教信仰尺寸。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号