...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychology of religion and spirituality >The Reasons of Atheists and Agnostics for Nonbelief in God's Existence Scale: Development and Initial Validation
【24h】

The Reasons of Atheists and Agnostics for Nonbelief in God's Existence Scale: Development and Initial Validation

机译:上帝存在规模非丑的无神论者和不可知论的原因:发展和初始验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Research exploring nonbelievers' reasons for not believing in the existence of god(s) has focused on theory development. Such efforts are valuable, but may not capture the lived experiences of nonbelievers. The current two studies quantitatively examined nonbelievers' self-reported reasons for nonbelief through developing the Reasons of Atheists and Agnostics for Nonbelief in God's Existence Scale (RANGES). We developed an initial pool of 64 items using prior published research, revised by a panel of experts including researchers and thought leaders in nonbelief communities. Both studies included participants from Amazon's Mechanical Turk (Study 1 & 2 Ns = 520 & 369), all of whom reported not believing in god(s). In Study 1, our exploratory factor analysis suggested nine factors across 35 items. In Study 2, we confirmed the nine-factor structure using 38 items (35 from Study 1 plus three new items for better coverage of factors with few items) with adequate fit. Across both studies, the RANGES subscales showed good reliability, convergent validity (e.g., positive correlations with previous lists of reasons for religious doubt), predictive validity (e.g., positive and negative feelings toward God and religion), and discriminant validity (e.g., subscales were not unexpectedly associated with other measures). Our 1-year follow-up with a subset of Study 2 participants (N = 132) found different levels of stability among the RANGES subscales. This measure can promote further understanding the motivations, identities, and experiences of nonbelievers across cultures.
机译:研究探索非信e不相信上帝存在的原因,专注于理论发展。这种努力是有价值的,但可能不会捕捉非招生者的生活经历。目前通过制定上帝存在量表(范围)的非贴言者的原因,定量地检查了非信e的自我报告的非丑的自我报告的原因。我们开发了使用先前公布的研究的64项初始池,由专家小组修订,包括非极其社区的研究人员和思想领导者。这两项研究包括来自亚马逊的机械土耳其人的参与者(研究1和2 NS = 520&369),所有这些都报告了没有相信上帝。在研究1中,我们的探索性因子分析建议了35件物品的九个因素。在研究2中,我们确认了使用38项的九个因素结构(从研究中35种加上三个新物品,以更好地覆盖少数物品的因素),充分适合。在这两个研究中,范围内容显示出良好的可靠性,收敛有效性(例如与先前的宗教疑问的原因列表的正相关),预测有效性(例如,对上帝和宗教的积极和负面情绪),以及判别有效性(例如,分量与其他措施没有意外相关)。我们的1年与学习子集进行后续行动2参与者(n = 132)在范围内发现了不同的稳定性。这项措施可以促进跨越文化的非信徒的动机,身份和经验进一步了解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号