...
首页> 外文期刊>Plasmid: An International Journal Devoted to Extrachromosomal Gene Systems >Multiple plasmid interference – Pledging allegiance to my enemy's enemy
【24h】

Multiple plasmid interference – Pledging allegiance to my enemy's enemy

机译:多种质粒干扰 - 对敌人的敌人效忠

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract As shown in the previous article, two distinct conjugative plasmids sometimes interact within bacterial cells, implicating changes of transfer rates. In most cases of interactions within bacteria, the transfer of one of the plasmids decreases. Less frequently, the transfer rate of one of the plasmids increases. Here we analyse what happens if three distinct conjugative plasmids colonize the same bacterial cell. Our aim is to understand how interactions between two plasmids affect the transfer rate of the third plasmid. After showing that plasmids interact in 59 out of 84 possible interactions we show that, with some exceptions, if the transfer rate of a plasmid decreases in the presence of a second plasmid, a decrease is also observed in the presence of a third plasmid. Moreover, if the conjugation rate of a plasmid increases in the presence of another, an increase is also observed if there is a third plasmid in the cell. Both types of interactions are mostly independent of the third plasmid's identity, even if sometimes the third plasmid quantitatively distorts the interaction of the other two plasmids. There is a bias towards negative intensifying interactions, which provide good news concerning the spread conjugative plasmids encoding antibiotic-resistance genes and virulence factors. Highlights ? Conjugative plasmids influence each other's transfer rate in 59 out of 84 possible cases. ? Mostly, if a plasmid is inhibitory towards a second plasmid, it remained inhibitory in the presence of a third plasmid. ? If a plasmid's conjugation rate increases in the presence of a second plasmid, it increases even if there is a third one. ? Both types of interactions are mostly independent of the third plasmid's identity. ? There is a bias towards negative intensifying interactions, suggesting plasmids “cooperate” to repress another plasmid.
机译:摘要如前一篇文章所示,两个不同的共轭质粒有时在细菌细胞内相互作用,暗示转移率的变化。在细菌内的大多数相互作用情况下,其中一种质粒的转移减少。较少,其中一种质粒的转移率增加。在这里,我们分析了三种不同的缀合质粒殖民化相同的细菌细胞。我们的目的是了解两个质粒之间的相互作用如何影响第三质粒的转移率。在显示质粒中的84个可能的相互作用中的59个中相互作用后,我们表明,对于一些例外,如果质粒的转移速率在第二质粒存在下降低,则在第三质粒存在下也观察到降低。此外,如果质粒的缀合速率在另一个存在的情况下增加,则如果细胞中存在第三质粒,则也观察到增加。两种类型的相互作用主要与第三种质粒的身份无关,即使有时第三质粒定量扭曲另外两个质粒的相互作用。存在偏向负强化相互作用,这提供了关于编码抗生素抗性基因和毒力因子的扩散共轭质粒的良好新闻。强调 ?共轭质粒在84个可能的情况下,彼此的转移率达到59例。还主要是,如果质粒是抑制朝向第二质粒的抑制,则在第三质粒存在下仍然存在抑制性。还如果质粒在第二质粒存在下增加,即使存在第三,它也会增加。还两种类型的相互作用主要与第三种质粒的身份无关。还对负强化相互作用有偏见,表明质粒“合作”抑制另一种质粒。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号