首页> 外文期刊>Petroleum Geoscience >Key controls on hydrocarbon retention and leakage from structural traps in the Hammerfest Basin, SW Barents Sea: implications for prospect analysis and risk assessment
【24h】

Key controls on hydrocarbon retention and leakage from structural traps in the Hammerfest Basin, SW Barents Sea: implications for prospect analysis and risk assessment

机译:哈默菲斯特盆地结构陷阱的碳氢化合物保留和泄漏的关键控制:展望分析和风险评估的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Evidence of hydrocarbon leakage has been well documented across the SW Barents Sea and is commonly associated with exhumation in the Cenozoic. While fault leakage is thought to be the most likely cause, other mechanisms are possible and should be considered. Further study is required to understand what specific mechanism(s) facilitate such leakage, and why this occurs in some locations and not others. In a case study of the Snohvit Field, we use seismic and well data to quantify fault- and top-seal strength based on mechanical and capillary threshold pressure properties of fault and cap rocks. Magnitude and timing of fault slip are measured to acknowledge the role that faults play in controlling fluid flow over time. Results based on theoretical andin situhydrocarbon column heights strongly indicate that across-fault and top-seal breach by capillary threshold pressure, and top-seal breach by mechanical failure are highly unlikely to have caused hydrocarbon leakage. Instead, top-seal breach caused by tectonic reactivation of identified faults is likely to have facilitated hydrocarbon leakage from structural traps. The results of this case study acknowledge the different mechanisms by which hydrocarbons can leak from a structural trap. Employing both a holistic and quantitative approach to assessing different seal capacities reduces the likelihood that a particular cause of hydrocarbon leakage is overlooked. This is particularly relevant for the Snohvit Field in its dual capacity as a producing gas field and as a carbon sequestration site since both systems rely on a thorough understanding of seal capacity and leakage potential.
机译:碳氢化合物泄漏的证据已经在SW巴伦海上进行了充分的记录,并且通常与新生代挖掘有关。虽然被认为是最有可能的原因,但是其他机制也是可能的,并且应该考虑。需要进一步的研究来了解具体机制促进这种泄漏,以及为什么这发生在某些地方而不是其他地方。在对Snohvit领域的案例研究中,我们使用地震和井数据量化故障和帽岩石的机械和毛细管阈值压力性能的故障和顶密封强度。测量故障滑动的幅度和定时,以确认故障在控制流体流动时发挥的作用。基于理论和素风水圆柱柱高度的结果强烈表示毛细管阈值压力的故障和顶密封突发,以及机械故障的顶部密封违规是极不可能引起碳氢化合物泄漏。相反,由所识别的故障的构造再活化引起的顶密封突发可能具有来自结构陷阱的碳氢化合物泄漏。本案例研究的结果应感谢碳氢化合物可以从结构陷阱泄漏的不同机制。采用整体和定量方法来评估不同的密封能力降低了覆盖了碳氢化合物泄漏特定原因的可能性。这与其双重容量的Snohvit场特别相关,因为两种系统都依赖于对密封容量和泄漏电位的彻底了解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号