首页> 外文期刊>Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells: An International Journal Devoted to Photovoltaic, Photothermal, and Photochemical Solar Energy Conversion >Effects of soiling and weathering on the albedo of building envelope materials: Lessons learned from natural exposure in two European cities and tuning of a laboratory simulation practice
【24h】

Effects of soiling and weathering on the albedo of building envelope materials: Lessons learned from natural exposure in two European cities and tuning of a laboratory simulation practice

机译:污染和风化对建筑信封材料的玻璃玻璃的影响:两种欧洲城市自然暴露的经验教训及实验室模拟实践的调整

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Chemical and physical stress, weathering, organic and inorganic matter deposition, and microbial growth over time, or "aging", affect the optical-radiative performance of building envelope materials. Natural exposure helps to quantify these effects, but it usually requires several years. Further, the contribution of the different degradation agents cannot be isolated, and results from different campaigns cannot be easily compared because of the variability in the boundary conditions producing aging. Here we present an adaptation of the protocol implemented by ASTM as D7897-18 "Standard Practice for Laboratory Soiling and Weathering of Roofing Materials to Simulate Effects of Natural Exposure on Solar Reflectance and Thermal Emittance". The aim is to reproduce in the laboratory the changes in albedo (solar reflectance) and thermal emittance experienced by building envelope materials in European urban areas rather than in the United States. We tuned the spraying duration and weathering cycles, and we compared the UV vis NIR reflectances of naturally-aged specimens (48 months in Rome and Milan) of roofing and wall finish materials to those exposed to laboratory weathering and soiling. Excluding those materials that show early physical-chemical degradation, the mean absolute deviation between natural and laboratory exposure of roofing products is equal to 0.027 in albedo. This is a lower value than the differences between two natural exposure campaigns at the same site. We clearly defined the limits of application of the protocol, providing an appraisal of the repeatability of natural aging. Moreover, we identified possible improvements in the methodology to conduct both natural and laboratory exposure.
机译:化学和物理应力,风化,有机物和无机物质沉积,以及微生物生长随时间,或“老化”,影响建筑包络材料的光辐射性能。自然曝光有助于量化这些影响,但通常需要几年。此外,由于产生老化的边界条件的可变性,不能容易分离出不同的降解剂的贡献,并且不同的运动结果不能容易地进行比较。在这里,我们展示了ASTM实施的协议作为D7897-18“屋顶材料的实验室污染和风化的标准实践”,以模拟自然暴露对太阳能反射和热辐射的影响“。目的是在实验室中繁殖Albedo(太阳反射率)和通过在欧洲城市地区而不是美国建立信封材料而经历的热粘合性的变化。我们调整了喷涂持续时间和风化循环,我们将天然老年标本(罗马48个月和米兰48个月)进行了与暴露于实验室风化和污染的人的UV Vis的反射。不包括那些显示早期物理化学降级的材料,屋顶产品的自然和实验室暴露之间的平均绝对偏差等于Albedo的0.027。这比同一站点的两个自然曝光活动之间的差异较低。我们明确裁定了议定书申请的限制,提供了对自然衰老的重复性的评估。此外,我们确定了进行自然和实验室暴露的方法的可能改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号