...
首页> 外文期刊>Science and Technology for the Built Environment >Heat and mass transfer performance comparison between a direct-contact liquid desiccant packed bed and a liquid-to-air membrane energy exchanger for air dehumidification
【24h】

Heat and mass transfer performance comparison between a direct-contact liquid desiccant packed bed and a liquid-to-air membrane energy exchanger for air dehumidification

机译:用于空气除湿的直接接触液干燥剂填充床和液 - 膜能量交换器之间的热量和传质性能比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Entrainment of liquid desiccant droplets into the airstream and flow maldistribution are two challenges for liquid desiccant packed beds. Liquid-to-air membrane energy exchangers are novel liquid desiccant exchangers that have the potential to overcome these challenges by using membranes to separate the air and solution flows but have higher heat and moisture transfer resistances. As a new contribution of this study, the heat mass transfer performance of these two exchangers with the same volume and operating condition are compared at two conditions: (1) with the same pressure drop on the air side and (2) with the same total heat/mass transfer area. Results show that liquid-to-air membrane energy exchanger gets up to 13 and 20% higher latent and total effectiveness respectively than the packed bed at the same air pressure drop. Reversely, the packed bed achieves up to 16% higher mass transfer performance than the liquid-to-air membrane energy exchanger with the same heat/mass transfer area. The flow maldistribution and its influences in the packed bed and liquid-to-air membrane energy exchanger are also discussed. Finally, the impact of membrane on the heat mass transfer in the liquid-to-air membrane energy exchanger is evaluated. The membrane accounts for 6 similar to 12% and 26 similar to 43% of the overall heat and mass transfer resistance, respectively, depending on the width of the air channel.
机译:将液体干燥剂液滴纳入气流和流动法分布是液体干燥剂包装床的两个挑战。液体 - 空气膜能量交换剂是新型液体干燥剂交换剂,其具有通过使用膜来分离空气和溶液流量但具有更高的热量和耐湿性的挑战。作为本研究的新贡献,在两个条件下比较了具有相同体积和操作条件的两种交换剂的热传质性能:(1)在空气侧和(2)上具有相同的压降和(2)热/传质区域。结果表明,液体膜能量交换器分别比在相同的气压下降的填充床上达到13至20%的潜伏和总有效性。相反,填充床比具有相同热/传质的液体膜能量交换器高达16%的质量转移性能。还讨论了流动的制剂及其在填充床和液体膜能量交换器中的影响。最后,评估膜对液 - 膜能量交换器中的热传质的影响。膜占6相似的6%和26,分别与空气通道的宽度分别相似的12%和26个相似的整体热量和传质阻力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号