...
首页> 外文期刊>Organic Geochemistry: A Publication of the International Association of Geochemistry and Cosmochemistry >Evaluating different methods for calculating the Carbon Preference Index (CPI): Implications for palaeoecological and archaeological research
【24h】

Evaluating different methods for calculating the Carbon Preference Index (CPI): Implications for palaeoecological and archaeological research

机译:评估计算碳偏好指数(CPI)的不同方法:对古生学和考古研究的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Carbon Preference Index (CPI) is a molecular ratio often used to assign the biological source and maturity of organic matter. This parameter is frequently employed in paleoenvironmental studies and archaeological applications. In this paper, we have evaluated the different results for this index using peak areas or concentrations from calibration curves. For this purpose, plant reference samples (Celtis Australis L.) and sediments from two archaeological sites were analysed. The results show that the values obtained depend on the method employed and, thus, interpretations may differ significantly. Consequently, the method used must be clearly stated in each particular application and results can only be compared when using the same protocol. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:碳偏好指数(CPI)是通常用于分配有机物质的生物源和成熟度的分子比。 该参数经常用于古环境研究和考古应用。 在本文中,我们已经使用峰值区域或浓度从校准曲线评估了该索引的不同结果。 为此目的,分析了植物参考样品(Celtis Australis L.)和来自两个考古遗址的沉积物。 结果表明,获得的值取决于所采用的方法,因此,解释可能有显着差异。 因此,必须在每个特定应用中清楚地说明使用的方法,并且只能在使用相同的协议时比较结果。 (c)2020提交人。 elsevier有限公司出版

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号