...
首页> 外文期刊>Musculoskeletal care. >Needle placement approach to subacromial injection in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: A systematic review
【24h】

Needle placement approach to subacromial injection in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: A systematic review

机译:亚脉络凝固综合征患者亚粒状注射针的针放置方法:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background Subacromial impingement syndrome (SAIS) is the most common cause of shoulder pain and is costly, in terms of disability and health service provision. Research evidence suggests that, generally, the anterior, lateral and posterior approaches are used by clinicians for subacromial injection. However, it is uncertain which of these approaches is more effective than the other in the management of SAIS. Objectives The aim of the present study was to determine the effectiveness of the anterior, lateral approach to subacromial injection compared with the posterior approach for the treatment of SAIS. Methods A comprehensive search was undertaken of CINAHL, MEDLINE, Cochrane, PEDro and the E‐Journals databases using full texts, from 1980 to April 2014 and updated in December 2016 via the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy (EBSCOhost). Studies of SAIS patients receiving cortisone injections which investigated needle placement through the lateral, posterior or anterior routes were included. Study selection, data extraction and appraisal of the study were undertaken by the researcher and his supervisor. Quality criteria were selected from PEDro, to form a checklist of 10 items. Results A total of 4265 citations were retrieved and screened for eligibility; 39 articles were assessed as full text and 8 met the inclusion criteria. They include four randomized controlled trials and four controlled trials. Due to the varying methodological quality, and clinical and statistical heterogeneity of these studies, they were analysed qualitatively, as a meta‐analysis was not possible. Conclusions The evidence establishing the superiority of any one method of subacromial injection approach over the other is unclear in clinical practice. This calls for further research into this area.
机译:摘要背景亚脉络抗冲综合征(SAIs)是肩痛最常见的原因,并且在残疾和健康服务条款方面是昂贵的。研究证据表明,通常,临床医生使用前侧,侧向和后近方法进行亚脉络注射。然而,不确定这些方法中的哪一个比在Sais的管理中更有效。目的本研究的目的是确定前侧侧向对亚脉络注射的有效性与索尼斯治疗的后途径相比。方法使用全文,从1980年到2014年4月,并于2016年4月通过特许物理学会(EBSCOHOST)(EBSCOHOST),在2014年至2014年12月更新的全文中,通过全文进行了全面搜索。包括接受通过横向,后部或前线进行调查的皮质酮注射的SAIS患者的研究。研究人员及其主管进行了研究选择,数据提取和评估。质量标准从佩德罗选择,形成10件的清单。结果检索4265引文,并筛选资格; 39条文件被评估为全文,8符合纳入标准。它们包括四项随机对照试验和四项对照试验。由于不同的方法质量和这些研究的临床和统计异质性,它们定性分析了它们,因为不可能是荟萃分析。结论在临床实践中不清楚临床实践中建立任何一种亚脉络注射方法方法的优越性的证据。这次要求进一步研究该地区。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号