...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical care >Comparing Rates of Adverse Events and Medical Errors on Inpatient Psychiatric Units at Veterans Health Administration and Community-based General Hospitals
【24h】

Comparing Rates of Adverse Events and Medical Errors on Inpatient Psychiatric Units at Veterans Health Administration and Community-based General Hospitals

机译:比较退伍军人健康管理和基于社区综合医院住院精神病患者的不良事件和医疗误差

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: There is limited knowledge about how general hospitals and Veterans Health Administration (VHA) hospitals fare relative to each other on a broad range of inpatient psychiatry-specific patient safety outcomes. This research compares data from 2 large-scale epidemiological studies of adverse events (AEs) and medical errors (MEs) in inpatient psychiatric units, one in VHA hospitals and the other in community-based general hospitals. Method: Retrospective medical record reviews assessed the prevalence of AEs and MEs in a sample of 4371 discharges from 14 community-based general hospitals (derived from 69,081 discharges at 85 hospitals) and a sample of 8005 discharges from 40 VHA hospitals (derived from 92,103 discharges at 105 medical centers). Rates of AEs and MEs across hospital systems were calculated, controlling for relevant patient and hospital characteristics. Results: The overall rate of AEs and MEs in inpatient psychiatric units of VHA hospitals was 7.11 and 1.49 per 100 patient discharges; at community-based acute care hospitals, these rates were 13.48 and 3.01 per 100 patient discharges. The adjusted odds ratio of a patient experiencing an AE and a ME at community-based hospitals as compared with VHA hospitals was 2.11 and 2.08, respectively. Conclusion: Although chart reviews may not document the complete nature and outcomes of care, even after controlling for differences in patient and hospital characteristics, psychiatric inpatients at community-based hospitals were twice as likely to experience AEs or MEs as inpatients at VHA hospitals. While community-based hospitals may lag behind VHA hospitals, both hospital systems should continue to pursue evidence-based improvements in patient safety. Future research aimed at changing hospital practices should draw on established strategies for bridging the gap from research to practice in order to improve the quality of care for this vulnerable patient population.
机译:目的:了解综合医院和退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)医院相对于各种住院性精神病学特定的患者安全结果的知识有限。该研究将来自住户精神病单元的2个不良事件(AES)和医疗错误(MES)的大规模流行病学研究的数据与VHA医院中的一个在社区的综合医院中进行了比较。方法:回顾性医疗记录评论评估了AES和ME的普遍存在4371个综合医院排放量的样本(来自85家医院的69,081次卸货)和8005家vha医院的排放量为8005个(衍生的92,103排放在105个医疗中心)。计算了医院系统的AES和MES的速率,控制了相关患者和医院特征。结果:VHA医院住院精神病单元的AES和ME的总体速率为7.11年,每100例患者排放量为7.11和1.49;在基于社区的急性护理医院,每100例患者排放量为13.48和3.01。与VHA医院相比,在基于社区的医院体验AE和ME的患者的调整后的赔率比分别为2.11和2.08。结论:虽然图表审查可能不会记录完整的性质和关怀结果,即使在控制患者和医院特征的差异后,社区医院的精神病院病患者也是VHA医院的住院患者体验AES或MES的两倍。虽然基于社区的医院可能会落后于VHA医院,但两家医院系统都应继续追求基于患者安全的证据。旨在改变医院实践的未来研究应该借鉴弥合从研究跨越差距的既定策略,以提高这种脆弱的患者人口的护理质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号