...
首页> 外文期刊>Global change biology >Can knowledge-based N management produce more staple grain with lower greenhouse gas emission and reactive nitrogen pollution? A meta-analysis
【24h】

Can knowledge-based N management produce more staple grain with lower greenhouse gas emission and reactive nitrogen pollution? A meta-analysis

机译:基于知识的N管理可以生产更多的小颗粒,温室气体排放和反应性氮污染较低? 荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Knowledge-based nitrogen (N) management, which is designed for a better synchronization of crop N demand with N supply, is critical for global food security and environmental sustainability. Yet, a comprehensive assessment on how these N management practices affect food production, greenhouse gas emission (GHG), and N pollution in China is lacking. We compiled the results of 376 studies (1166 observations) to evaluate the overall effects of seven knowledge-based N management practices on crop productivity, nitrous oxide (N2O) emission, and major reactive N (Nr) losses (ammonia, NH3; N leaching and runoff), for staple grain (rice, wheat, and corn) production in China. These practices included the application of controlled-release N fertilizer, nitrification inhibitor (NI) and urease inhibitor (UI), higher splitting frequency of fertilizer N application, lower basal N fertilizer (BF) proportion, deep placement of N fertilizer, and optimal N rate based on soil N test. Our results showed that, compared to traditional N management, these knowledge-based N practices significantly increased grain yields by 1.3-10.0%, which is attributed to the higher aboveground N uptake (5.1-12.1%) and N use efficiency in grain (8.0-48.2%). Moreover, these N management practices overall reduced GHG emission and Nr losses, by 5.4-39.8% for N2O emission, 30.7-61.5% for NH3 emission (except for the NI application), 13.6-37.3% for N leaching, and 15.5-45.0% for N runoff. The use of NI increased NH3 emission by 27.5% (9.0-56.0%), which deserves extra-attention. The cost and benefit analysis indicated that the yield profit of these N management practices exceeded the corresponding input cost, which resulted in a significant increase of the net economic benefit by 2.9-12.6%. These results suggest that knowledge-based N management practice can be considered an effective way to ensure food security and improve environmental sustainability, while increasing economic return.
机译:基于知识的氮气(N)管理,该管理是为了更好地同步作物N需求,对全球粮食安全和环境可持续性至关重要。然而,缺乏关于如何影响粮食生产,温室气体排放(GHG)和中国的N污染的全面评估。我们编制了376项研究的结果(1166个观察),以评估七种知识的N管理实践对作物生产率,氧化亚氮(N2O)发射和主要反应性N(NR)损失(氨,NH3; N浸出的主要影响和径流),在中国生产主食谷物(米饭,小麦和玉米)。这些实践包括控释N肥,硝化抑制剂(Ni)和脲酶抑制剂(UI),肥料N较高的施用频率,较低的基础肥(BF)比例,深放置肥料,最佳N基于土壤试验的率。我们的研究结果表明,与传统的N管理相比,这些知识的N实践将谷物产量显着增加1.3-10.0%,归因于谷物的较高的N个吸收(5.1-12.1%)和N使用效率(8.0 -48.2%)。此外,这些管理实践总体降低了GHG排放和NR损失,NH 3排放的30.7-61.5%(NI申请除外),N次浸出的13.6-37.3%,15.5-45.0 n径流的%。 NI的使用增加了NH3排放量27.5%(9.0-56.0%),值得关注。成本和效益分析表明,这些管理实践的产量利润超过了相应的投入成本,这导致净经济福利的显着增加2.9-12.6%。这些结果表明,基于知识的N管理实践可以被认为是确保粮食安全和提高环境可持续性的有效方法,同时增加经济回报。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Global change biology》 |2017年第5期|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Chinese Acad Sci Inst Soil Sci State Key Lab Soil &

    Sustainable Agr Nanjing 210008 Jiangsu Peoples R China;

    Univ Melbourne Fac Vet &

    Agr Sci Crop &

    Soil Sci Sect Melbourne Vic 3010 Australia;

    Univ Melbourne Fac Vet &

    Agr Sci Crop &

    Soil Sci Sect Melbourne Vic 3010 Australia;

    Chinese Acad Sci Inst Soil Sci State Key Lab Soil &

    Sustainable Agr Nanjing 210008 Jiangsu Peoples R China;

    Chinese Acad Sci Inst Soil Sci State Key Lab Soil &

    Sustainable Agr Nanjing 210008 Jiangsu Peoples R China;

    Chinese Acad Sci Inst Soil Sci State Key Lab Soil &

    Sustainable Agr Nanjing 210008 Jiangsu Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 物候学;
  • 关键词

    cost and benefit; grain yield; greenhouse gas; knowledge-based N management; reactive N losses;

    机译:成本和利益;谷物产量;温室气体;基于知识的N管理;无功n损失;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号