...
首页> 外文期刊>Global change biology >Characterising the biophysical, economic and social impacts of soil carbon sequestration as a greenhouse gas removal technology
【24h】

Characterising the biophysical, economic and social impacts of soil carbon sequestration as a greenhouse gas removal technology

机译:作为温室气体去除技术的土壤碳封存的生物物理,经济和社会影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To limit warming to well below 2 degrees C, most scenario projections rely on greenhouse gas removal technologies (GGRTs); one such GGRT uses soil carbon sequestration (SCS) in agricultural land. In addition to their role in mitigating climate change, SCS practices play a role in delivering agroecosystem resilience, climate change adaptability and food security. Environmental heterogeneity and differences in agricultural practices challenge the practical implementation of SCS, and our analysis addresses the associated knowledge gap. Previous assessments have focused on global potentials, but there is a need among policymakers to operationalise SCS. Here, we assess a range of practices already proposed to deliver SCS, and distil these into a subset of specific measures. We provide a multidisciplinary summary of the barriers and potential incentives towards practical implementation of these measures. First, we identify specific practices with potential for both a positive impact on SCS at farm level and an uptake rate compatible with global impact. These focus on: (a) optimising crop primary productivity (e.g. nutrient optimisation, pH management, irrigation); (b) reducing soil disturbance and managing soil physical properties (e.g. improved rotations, minimum till); (c) minimising deliberate removal of C or lateral transport via erosion processes (e.g. support measures, bare fallow reduction); (d) addition of C produced outside the system (e.g. organic manure amendments, biochar addition); (e) provision of additional C inputs within the cropping system (e.g. agroforestry, cover cropping). We then consider economic and non-cost barriers and incentives for land managers implementing these measures, along with the potential externalised impacts of implementation. This offers a framework and reference point for holistic assessment of the impacts of SCS. Finally, we summarise and discuss the ability of extant scientific approaches to quantify the technical potential and externalities of SCS measures, and the barriers and incentives to their implementation in global agricultural systems.
机译:限制升温到低于2摄氏度,大多数情景投影依赖于温室气体去除技术(GGRTS);一种这样的GGRT在农业用地使用土壤碳封存(SCS)。除了在减轻气候变化方面的作用外,SCS实践在提供农业系统恢复力,气候变化适应性和粮食安全方面发挥作用。农业实践环境异质性和差异挑战SCS的实际实施,我们的分析解决了相关的知识差距。以前的评估专注于全球潜力,但在政策制定者中需要在SCS运营中。在这里,我们评估了已经提出的一系列实践来提供SCS,并将这些蒸发成具体措施的子集。我们提供了对这些措施实际实施的障碍和潜在激励措施的多学科概述。首先,我们确定有可能对农业水平的积极影响以及与全球影响相兼容的摄取的积极影响的具体实践。这些关注:(a)优化作物初级生产力(例如营养优化,pH管理,灌溉); (b)减少土壤干扰和管理土壤物理性质(例如,改善旋转,最小直到); (c)通过腐蚀过程最小化故意除去C或横向运输(例如,支持措施,裸露的减少); (d)在系统外产生的C添加(例如有机粪便修正案,生物炭加成); (e)在裁剪系统内提供额外的C投入(例如农林造影,覆盖裁剪)。然后,我们考虑实施这些措施的土地管理人员的经济和非成本障碍和激励,以及实施的潜在外在的实施。这提供了对SCS影响的全面评估的框架和参考点。最后,我们总结并讨论了现存科学方法量化SCS措施的技术潜力和外部性的能力,以及在全球农业系统中实施的障碍和激励。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号