...
首页> 外文期刊>Global change biology >Afforestation for climate change mitigation: Potentials, risks and trade-offs
【24h】

Afforestation for climate change mitigation: Potentials, risks and trade-offs

机译:气候变化的植入减缓:潜在,风险和权衡

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Afforestation is considered a cost-effective and readily available climate change mitigation option. In recent studies afforestation is presented as a major solution to limit climate change. However, estimates of afforestation potential vary widely. Moreover, the risks in global mitigation policy and the negative trade-offs with food security are often not considered. Here we present a new approach to assess the economic potential of afforestation with the IMAGE 3.0 integrated assessment model framework. In addition, we discuss the role of afforestation in mitigation pathways and the effects of afforestation on the food system under increasingly ambitious climate targets. We show that afforestation has a mitigation potential of 4.9 GtCO(2)/year at 200 US$/tCO(2) in 2050 leading to large-scale application in an SSP2 scenario aiming for 2 degrees C (410 GtCO(2) cumulative up to 2100). Afforestation reduces the overall costs of mitigation policy. However, it may lead to lower mitigation ambition and lock-in situations in other sectors. Moreover, it bears risks to implementation and permanence as the negative emissions are increasingly located in regions with high investment risks and weak governance, for example in Sub-Saharan Africa. Afforestation also requires large amounts of land (up to 1,100 Mha) leading to large reductions in agricultural land. The increased competition for land could lead to higher food prices and an increased population at risk of hunger. Our results confirm that afforestation has substantial potential for mitigation. At the same time, we highlight that major risks and trade-offs are involved. Pathways aiming to limit climate change to 2 degrees C or even 1.5 degrees C need to minimize these risks and trade-offs in order to achieve mitigation sustainably.
机译:植树造林被认为是一种成本效益和易于获得的气候变化缓解选择。最近的研究造林作为限制气候变化的主要解决方案。然而,造林潜力的估计差异很大。此外,往往不考虑全球缓解政策的风险和粮食安全的负面折衷。在这里,我们提出了一种新的方法来评估与图像3.0综合评估模型框架的造林的经济潜力。此外,我们讨论了造林在减缓途径中的作用和造林在越来越雄心勃勃的气候目标下食品体系的影响。我们展示造林在2050年的2050年的200美元GTCO(2)/年的减缓潜力,导致SSP2场景中的大规模应用,旨在2度C(410 GTCO(2)累积累积到2100)。植树造林减少了减缓政策的总成本。但是,它可能导致其他部门的缓解野心和锁定情况。此外,由于在撒哈拉以南非洲,负排放越来越多地排放在撒哈拉以南非洲,因此越来越多地承担了实施和持久性的风险。造林还需要大量的土地(高达1,100 MHA),导致农业用地减少。对土地的竞争增加可能导致更高的食品价格和饥饿风险的人口增加。我们的结果证实,造林具有缓解的大量潜力。与此同时,我们强调了涉及重大风险和权衡。旨在将气候变化为2度C或甚至1.5度C的途径需要尽量减少这些风险和权衡,以便可持续减缓。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号