【24h】

Stellar equilibrium vs. gravitational collapse

机译:恒星均衡与引力塌陷

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The idea of gravitational collapse can be traced back to the first solution of Einstein's equations, but in these early stages, compelling evidence to support this idea was lacking. Furthermore, there were many theoretical gaps underlying the conviction that a star could not contract beyond its critical radius. The philosophical views of the early 20th century, especially those of Sir Arthur S. Eddington, imposed equilibrium as an almost unquestionable condition on theoretical models describing stars. This paper is a historical and epistemological account of the theoretical defiance of this equilibrium hypothesis, with a novel reassessment of J.R. Oppenheimer's work on astrophysics.
机译:引力崩溃的想法可以追溯到爱因斯坦方程的第一个解决方案,但在这些早期阶段,令人信服的证据缺乏支持这个想法。 此外,恒星潜在地存在许多理论差距,即明星无法超越其临界半径。 20世纪初的哲学观点,特别是亚瑟·埃丁顿爵士的哲学观点,施加了对描述星星理论模型的几乎毫无疑问的条件。 本文是一个历史和认识论的理论蔑视这一均衡假设,具有J.R. Oppenheimer在天体物理学的工作中的新重新评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号