...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of anaesthesiology >Adding sufentanil to ropivacaine in continuous thoracic paravertebral block fails to improve analgesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery: A randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Adding sufentanil to ropivacaine in continuous thoracic paravertebral block fails to improve analgesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery: A randomised controlled trial

机译:在连续胸椎椎间膜块中加入罗比卡因的苏芬太尼未能改善视频辅助胸部手术后的镇痛:随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUNDThe benefit of adding opioid to a local anaesthetic for continuous thoracic paravertebral analgesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is unclear.OBJECTIVESTo analyse the analgesic efficacy of ropivacaine and sufentanil in combination compared with ropivacaine alone after VATS.DESIGNA randomised, double-blinded, single-centre clinical trial.SETTINGA tertiary university hospital between March 2010 and April 2014.PATIENTSNinety patients were recruited, two were not included leaving 88 randomised into two groups. Eighteen patients were excluded from analysis and 70 completed the study.INTERVENTIONTo receive thoracic paravertebral analgesia with either 2mgml(-1) ropivacaine and 0.25gml(-1) sufentanil (ropivacaine+sufentanil group) or 2mgml(-1) ropivacaine alone (ropivacaine group) for 48h postoperatively. Infusion rate was set at 0.15mlkg(-1)h(-1) in both groups.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESThe primary endpoint was the mean total amount of self-administered morphine by the patients in each group at 48h postoperatively.RESULTSThe mean SD total amount of self-administered morphine was not significantly different between groups (53.127.2mg in the ropivacaine+sufentanil group vs. 58.8 +/- 34.3mg in the ropivacaine group; P=0.72). No significant differences were found between the two groups in either pain scores at rest or during movement, in opioid-related adverse reactions, in patient satisfaction or length of hospital stay.CONCLUSIONAdding 0.25gml(-1) sufentanil to 2mgml(-1) ropivacaine in continuous thoracic paravertebral analgesia for VATS did not reduce morphine consumption or pain scores when compared with ropivacaine alone. We cannot recommend its use for routine clinical practice. Further studies analysing different concentrations and infusion rates of sufentanil are needed before a lack of efficacy can be confirmed.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinical trial registrations: EudraCT: 2009-014832-38. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT 01082744.
机译:背景技术在视频辅助胸部外科(VATS)之后将阿片类药物添加到局部麻醉剂中尚未清除.Bobjectivesto分析罗比卡因和Sufentanil的镇痛功效与单独的Ropivacaine在VATS.Designa随机化,双盲后相比。 ,单中心临床试验。2010年3月和2014年4月之间的塞特塔第三大学医院。招聘患者,两名不包括将88人随机留成两组。 18名患者被排除在分析中,70名已完成该研究。手术治疗胸部倒膜镇痛与2mgml(-1)罗哌卡因和0.25gml(-1)Sufentanil(Ropivacaine + sufentanil组)或2mgml(-1)罗哌卡因(Ropivacaine组)术后48小时。在两组中,输液速率设定为0.15mlkg(-1)h(-1).Main结果测量术中终点是每组患者在术后48小时的患者的平均总量。结果是SD总金额自我施用的吗啡在罗伯卡因组中的群体之间没有显着差异(罗哌卡因+苏芬沙尼尔组+苏芬太尼群组,58.8 +/- 34.3mg; p = 0.72)。两组在休息或运动期间的两组之间没有显着差异,在阿片类药物相关的不良反应中,患者满意的不良反应,患者满意度或医院入住的长度。包括0.25gml(-1)苏芬太尼至2mgml(-1)罗哌啶与单独的Ropivacaine相比,VATS的连续胸部倒膜镇痛没有减少吗啡的消费或疼痛分数。我们无法建议使用其用于常规临床实践。进一步的研究在缺乏疗效之前,需要分析不同浓度和苏芬太尼的输注速率,可以确认。统计临床试验登记:eudract:2009-014832-38。 ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT 01082744。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号