...
首页> 外文期刊>Engineering Geology >Evaluation of methods for determining crack initiation stress under compression
【24h】

Evaluation of methods for determining crack initiation stress under compression

机译:压缩下测定裂纹启动应力的方法评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The accurate determination of crack initiation stress (CI) is significant for understanding rock deformation and failure. In this paper, a new concept is introduced, namely the relative compression strain response (RCSR), which represents the compressive deformation of the rock before dilatancy of the rock is introduced. An RCSR-based method for determining CI is proposed and compared with existing methods, i.e., (1) the volumetric strain (VS) method, (2) the lateral strain (LS) method, (3) the crack volumetric strain (CVS) method, (4) the cumulative acoustic emission hit tangent (CAEHT) method, and (5) the lateral strain response (LSR) method. Data for the comparison are collected from 227 uniaxial compression test and 222 compression test for diverse rock types. The comparison results show that, the CI determined using the proposed method is in good agreement with that determined using the existing methods. The CI values determined using different methods are similar, at approximately 0.5 of uniaxial compressive strength (UCS). The ratio of CI to peak strength (PS) is approximately 0.55 under triaxial compression, which is greater than the CI/UCS ratio. According to the analysis of variance (ANOVA), there is no statistical difference among the existing methods. Compared with the exisiting methods, the proposed method has advantages of avoiding users judgment subjectivity Thus, the RCSR method can be employed to determine the CI under uniaxial and triaxial compression.
机译:精确测定裂纹启动应力(CI)对于理解岩石变形和失败是显着的。在本文中,引入了一种新概念,即相对压缩应变响应(RCSR),其表示引入岩石膨胀前的岩石的压缩变形。提出了一种用于确定CI的RCSR的方法,并与现有方法进行比较,即(1)体积菌株(VS)方法,(2)横向菌株(LS)方法,(3)裂纹体积菌株(CVS)方法,(4)累积声发射命中切线(CAEHT)方法,和(5)横向应变响应(LSR)方法。从227个单轴压缩测试和222个压缩测试中收集了比较的数据,以获得不同的岩石类型。比较结果表明,使用所提出的方法确定的CI与使用现有方法确定的吻合良好。使用不同方法测定的CI值类似,在单轴抗压强度(UCS)的大约0.5处相似。在三轴压缩下CI与峰强度(PS)的比率约为0.55,其大于CI / UCS比率。根据方差分析(ANOVA),现有方法中没有统计学差异。与避险方法相比,所提出的方法具有避免用户判断主体性的优点,因此可以采用RCSR方法来确定单轴和三轴压缩下的CI。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号