...
首页> 外文期刊>Engineering Geology >Modification of the liquefaction potential index to consider the topography in Christchurch, New Zealand
【24h】

Modification of the liquefaction potential index to consider the topography in Christchurch, New Zealand

机译:修改液化潜在指标,以考虑基督城,新西兰的地形

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AbstractIn recent years, many have mapped the liquefaction potential index (LPI) to describe the liquefaction hazard at regional scale. Several investigators have calibrated the LPI to field observations of liquefaction-induced ground failure after a number of major earthquakes; the significance of LPI values and their correlation with the severity of liquefaction-induced ground failure can vary greatly depending on the calibration. In this study, the LPI was computed at more than 1200 cone penetration test soundings across the Christchurch area, New Zealand, using peak ground accelerations from the 2011 Christchurch Earthquake. Based on detailed field observations of liquefaction-induced ground failure after the earthquake, it was shown that the LPI has potential for discriminating between areas with no liquefaction-induced ground failure hazard and areas that may experience liquefaction-induced ground oscillations and settlement; however, the LPI performed poorly at sites where severe ground failures occurred, especially at sites that experienced lateral spreading. As many researchers have found a positive correlation between lateral spreading and the proximity and depth of a nearby free-face (i.e., a steep topographic depression, river channel, etc.), a new LPI framework was proposed that includes a parameter named the free-face ratio (FFR).FFRwas shown to have a significant correlation with field observations of lateral spreading in Christchurch. It was shown that by incorporatingFFRinto the LPI framework, modified LPI values are positively correlated with the severity of field observations of liquefaction-induced ground failure in Christchurch. It was also shown that maps can be produced based on LPI andFFR, and such maps rarely underpredict the liquefaction-induced ground failure hazard, unlike maps based on the unmodified LPI.Highlights?The original LPI framework was found to be a poor predictor and discriminator of lateral spreading.?A new parameter was introduced to the LPI model named the free-face ratio which was found to be correlated with the severity of lateral spreading.?By modifying LPI to also be a function ofFFR, a new index was produced namedLPI*?LPI*was shown to be a much better predictor of lateral spreading than unmodified LPI and it was shown to rarely underpredict liquefaction-induced ground failure severity.]]>
机译:<![cdata [ 抽象 近年来,许多人已经绘制了液化潜在指数(LPI)来描述区域规模的液化危险。几种主要地震后,几位研究人员已经校准了LPI液化诱导的地面失效的场景; LPI值的重要性及其与液化诱导的地面失效的严重程度的相关性可以根据校准大大变化。在这项研究中,利用2011年基督城地震的峰地接地加速来计算LPI在克赖斯特彻奇地区的1200多个锥形渗透试验探测。基于地震后液化诱导的地面失效的详细场观察,表明LPI具有歧视区域之间,没有液化诱导的地面破坏危险和可能经历液化引起的地面振荡和沉降的区域;然而,LPI在发生严重的地面故障的地点时表现不佳,特别是在经历横向扩散的地点。由于许多研究人员发现了横向扩散和附近的自由面(即,陡峭地形凹陷,河道等)的接近度和深度之间的正相关性,提出了一种新的LPI框架,其中包括命名为自由的参数 - 表面比( ffr )。 ffr 斜体>与基督城横向扩散的现场观察具有显着相关性。结果表明,通过将 ffr 进入LPI框架,改性的LPI值与基督城液化诱导的地面失败的现场观察的严重程度正相关。还表明,可以基于LPI和 FFR ,并且这种地图很少低于液化诱导的地面破坏危险,而不是基于未修饰的LPI的地图。 突出显示 发现原始的LPI框架是侧向扩展的差的预测器和鉴别器。 将新参数引入到名为的LPI模型,命名为自由面比被发现与迟到的严重程度相关联兰尔蔓延。 通过修改LPI来成为 ffr ,一个名为 lpi * lpi * 被显示为横向扩散的更好的预测因子,而不是未经修改的LPI,并且显示很少欠液化液化诱导的地下失败严重程度。 ]]>

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号