...
首页> 外文期刊>International Geology Review >Reply to Molina-Garza et al. (2019) 'Discussion of: Ortega-Flores et al. (2018) provenance analysis of Oligocene sandstone from the Cerro Pelon area, southern Gulf of Mexico'
【24h】

Reply to Molina-Garza et al. (2019) 'Discussion of: Ortega-Flores et al. (2018) provenance analysis of Oligocene sandstone from the Cerro Pelon area, southern Gulf of Mexico'

机译:回复Molina-Garza等。 (2019)“讨论:Ortega-flores等。(2018)来自墨西哥南部南湾塞罗佩隆地区的少茂砂岩的弥粒砂岩。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The origin of the Oligocene turbidites from the Cerro Pelon area in south Gulf Mexico proposed by Ortega-Flores ef al. (2018) is in disagree with the interpretations made by Molina-Garza ef al. (2019), which main criticism is based on U-Pb ages of detrital zircons from the matrix of a conglomerate unit, which they refer to as 'Nanchital Conglomerate', as well as on the presence of limestone, gabbros, and mafic protolith-derived clasts. Molina-Garza et al. (2019) basically interpret the Nanchital Conglomerate as Miocene in age, which was sourced mainly from metamorphic complexes including their sedimentary covers located to the west and south of the Cerro Pelon area. For some reason, Molina-Garza et al. (2019) suppose that the Nanchital Conglomerate should have the same provenance sources that the Oligocene turbidites from Cerro Pelon area, reported by Ortega-Flores et al. (2018). Based on the foregoing, we strongly disagree with Molina-Garza ef al. (2019) considering that, from the beginning, they intend to compare two units of different age. Additionally, the scarce data reported from both the matrix and the clasts of the Nanchital Conglomerate are not determinant for interpreting the provenance of this conglomeratic unit and subsequently, to consider the same rock sources from the Oligocene through Miocene time.
机译:来自南湾墨西哥的塞罗·普罗隆地区的Oligocene浊度的起源,由奥特格 - 弗洛雷斯(EF Al)提出。 (2018)不同意莫里纳 - 加尔佐EF al的解释。 (2019年),主要批评是基于来自集团单位的矩阵的邪恶锆石的U-Pb年龄,他们将其称为“野人集团”以及石灰石,GABBROS和MAFIC促果实的存在 - 衍生的泥水。 Molina-Garza等。 (2019年)基本上将南北集团作为中生的南非群,主要来自变质复合物,包括其沉积盖,位于西部和南部的Cerro Pelon地区。出于某种原因,Molina-Garza等人。 (2019)假设南北集团应具有相同的原子源来源,由奥尔格弗洛雷斯等人报告的Cerro Pelon地区的寡核苷浊。 (2018)。基于前述,我们非常不同意莫里纳 - 加尔佐EF al。 (2019)考虑到,从一开始,他们打算比较两个不同年龄的单位。另外,来自南非群的基质和裂纹报告的稀缺数据不是用于解释该集合单元的出处并随后解释来自寡核苷的相同岩石来源的决定簇。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号