...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Animal Nutrition >The effect of eubiotic feed additives on the performance of growing pigs and the activity of intestinal microflora
【24h】

The effect of eubiotic feed additives on the performance of growing pigs and the activity of intestinal microflora

机译:嗜酸纤维饲料添加剂对生长猪的性能和肠道微生物活性的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of probiotic bacteria, prebiotics, phytobiotics and their combinations on performance and microbial activity in the digestive tract of growing pigs. The experiment was conducted over 28 d on 48 male pigs of about 12kg body weight (BW), which were allocated to following treatments.: (1) Control Group (Con) without additive, (2) Group I, addition of a prebiotic (inulin), (3) Group Ph, a phytobiotic (herbal water extracts), (4) Group P, a probiotic composed of four strains of lactic acid bacteria, (5) Group PhP, phytobiotic and probiotic bacteria and (6) Group PhPI, a phytobiotic, probiotic bacteria and a prebiotic. Animal performance was recorded and at d 28 six pigs from each group were euthanised to collect digesta samples. In all groups except for Group I, diarrhoea incidents were observed. Groups Ph and P had significantly higher daily gains and final BW, and Group Ph utilised feed better than other groups. The pH of ileal digesta was significantly lower in Group PhPI. In the caecal digesta of Groups I, P and PhP, the pH level was lower than in the other groups but dry matter contents was significantly higher in Groups Con and I. The short-chain fatty acids and particular acid content differed significantly only in the colonic digesta. The yeast and mould numbers in caecal digesta was highest in Group Con. No treatment effects were observed for the number of lactic acid bacteria, coli group bacteria or Clostridium. However, the observed significantly higher number of total bacteria suggests that a multi-component eubiotic treatment changes the bacterial composition and distribution more effectively. Our findings indicated that all used additives changed the intestinal microflora, but the multi-component eubiotics were not beneficial as feed additives offered separately. Moreover, supplementation of phytobiotics and probiotic bacteria also improved the animal performance significantly.
机译:本研究的目的是比较益生菌细菌,益生元,植物生物学的影响及其组合在生长猪的消化道中的性能和微生物活性。该实验在约12kg体重(BW)的48只雄性猪上进行了超过28d,其分配给治疗方法:(1)对照组(CON)没有添加剂,(2)I组,添加益生元(菊粉),(3)基团pH,植物(草药提取物),(4)组P,益生菌由四种乳酸菌组成,(5)基团,植物和益生菌和(6)组pHPI组,植物,益生菌和益生元。在D 28中记录动物性能,每组的六只猪都被安乐死,以收集Digesta样品。在所有组中,除了群体外,观察到腹泻事件。群体pH和P具有明显较高的每日收益和最终BW,并利用比其他组更好的饲料。 PHPI组髂骨Digesta的pH显着降低。在I,P和PHP组的粘颈沸腾中,pH水平低于其他组,但在CON和I的组中,干物质含量明显高。短链脂肪酸和特定酸含量仅在结肠疾病。 CAECAL DIGESTA中的酵母和模具数在组CON中最高。对于乳酸菌,大肠杆菌组织或梭菌的数量没有观察到治疗效果。然而,观察到的总细菌数量显着提高了多组分嗜酸钙治疗更有效地改变了细菌组合物和分布。我们的研究结果表明,所有使用的添加剂都改变了肠道微生物,但多组分嗜酸钙无益于于单独提供的饲料添加剂。此外,补充植物生物学和益生菌的含量显着提高了动物性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号