Assessment of Interobserver Variability in the Peer Review Process: Should We Agree to Disagree?

Verma Nupur; Hippe Daniel S.; Robinson Jeffrey D.

首页> 外文期刊>AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences >Assessment of Interobserver Variability in the Peer Review Process: Should We Agree to Disagree?

【24h】

Assessment of Interobserver Variability in the Peer Review Process: Should We Agree to Disagree?

机译：评估同行评审过程中的Interobserver变异性：我们是否同意不同意？

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

OBJECTIVE. Peer review is an important and necessary part of radiology. There are several options to perform the peer review process. This study examines the reproducibility of peer review by comparing two scoring systems.

机译：客观的。同行评审是放射学的重要和必要部分。有几种选择来执行对等审查过程。本研究审查了通过比较两个评分系统的同行评审的再现性。

著录项

来源
《AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences》 |2016年第6期|共8页
作者
Verma Nupur; Hippe Daniel S.; Robinson Jeffrey D.;
展开▼
作者单位

Univ Florida Dept Radiol Gainesville FL 32610 USA;

Univ Washington Dept Radiol Harborview Med Ctr 325 9th Ave Box 359728 Seattle WA 98104 USA;

Univ Washington Dept Radiol Harborview Med Ctr 325 9th Ave Box 359728 Seattle WA 98104 USA;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类放射医学;
关键词
interobserver variability peer review; quality improvement; RADPEER;

机译：Interobserver变异性同行评审;质量改进;Radpeer;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Assessment of Interobserver Variability in the Peer Review Process: Should We Agree to Disagree? [J] . Verma Nupur, Hippe Daniel S., Robinson Jeffrey D. AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences . 2016,第6期

机译：评估同行评审过程中的Interobserver变异性：我们是否同意不同意？
2. EPA moves forward on chemical work plan, detailing peer review process for upcoming risk assessments [J] . Chris Knight Pesticide & Chemical Policy . 2012,第36期

机译：EPA推进了化学品工作计划，详细介绍了即将进行的风险评估的同行评审过程
3. Peer review process: Assessments by applicant-nominated referees are biased, inflated, unreliable and invalid [J] . Herbert W. Marsh, Nigel W. Bond, Upali W. Jayasinghe Australian Psychologist . 2007,第1期

机译：同行评审过程：申请人提名的裁判的评估有偏见，夸大，不可靠且无效
4. THE USE OF COMPREHENSIVE IN-PROCESS PEER REVIEWS IN SUPPORT OF THE UK ABWR PSA GENERIC DESIGN ASSESSMENT PROCESS [C] . Dennis Henneke, Jonathan Li, Glen Seeman, International topical meeting on probabilistic safety assessment and analysis . 2017

机译：在英国ABWR PSA通用设计评估流程支持中使用全面的过程中同行评审
5. Do human resource professionals and managers agree or disagree with the characteristics of the millennial generation? [D] . O'Brien, Jessica 2013

机译：人力资源专业人士和管理人员是否同意或不同意千禧一代的特征？
6. Reviewing the review: a qualitative assessment of the peer review process in surgical journals [O] . Catherine H. Davis, Barbara L. Bass, Kevin E. Behrns, 2018

机译：审阅审阅：对外科期刊同行审阅过程的定性评估
7. Do they agree? Bibliometric evaluation versus informed peer review in the Italian research assessment exercise [O] . Baccini, Alberto, De Nicolao, Giuseppe 2016

机译：他们同意吗？文献计量评估与意大利研究评估活动中的知情同行评审
8. Cleaner Technologies Substitutes Assessment for Professional Fabricare Processes: Peer Review Process Final rept [R] . Wood, B. J., Armbruster, M. 1998

机译：Cleaner Technologies替代专业Fabricare流程评估：同行评审流程最终审核

Assessment of Interobserver Variability in the Peer Review Process: Should We Agree to Disagree?

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅