...
【24h】

6X6?C2X n π–π complexes?]]>

机译:<![CANDA [CANDA和AB INITIO方法是否充分描述了强烈侵扰性C 6 X 6 CE:INF PLACE =“POST”> 2 X N π -π复合物?]>

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Graphical abstract Display Omitted Highlights ? Determines CCSD(T)/CBS binding energies for C6X6?C2X n complexes. ? The complexation energies range between 11.1 and 34.0kJmol? 1. ? Evaluates the performance of a wide range of DFT and ab initio methods. ? The G4 and G4(MP2) methods exhibit surprisingly poor performance. ? Identifies the best performing DFT and double-hybrid DFT functionals. Abstract We calculate the CCSD(T)/CBS complexation energies of C6X6?C2X n complexes (X=F, Cl; n =2, 4) by means of the W1-F12 and CCSD(T)/MP2(CBS) procedures. These complexes involve π–π stacking, charge-transfer, and van der Waals interactions and their complexation energies range between 11.1 (C6F6?C2F2) and 34.0 (C6Cl6?C2Cl4)kJmol? 1. We use our best CCSD(T)/CBS data to assess the performance of DFT, double-hybrid DFT (DHDFT), and standard/composite ab initio methods. The G4 and G4(MP2) composite methods show relatively poor performance with root-mean-square deviations (RMSDs) of 8.7 and 6.3展开▼
机译:<![cdata [ 图形摘要 显示省略 亮点 确定C 6 X 6 ?C 2 X < CE:斜体> n 复合体。 梳理能量在11.1和34.0之间的络合能量范围 kj mol 1 评估各种DFT和AB Initio方法的性能。 G4和G4(MP2)方法表现出令人惊讶的糟糕的表现。 识别最佳执行DFT和双混合DFT功能。 抽象 我们计算C 6的CCSD(T)/ CBS复合能量。> 6 x 6 ?c 2 x < CE:INF LOC =“POST”> N 复合物(X = F, CL; n = 2,4)通过W1-F12和CCSD(T )/ mp2(cbs)程序。这些配合物涉及π-π堆叠,电荷转移和范德华相互作用及其络合能量范围11.1(C 6 F 6 ?C 2 F 2 )和34.0(C 6> 6 CL 6 ?C 2 CL 4 KJ MOL 1 。我们使用最好的CCSD(T)/ CBS数据来评估DFT,双混合DFT(DHDFT)和标准/复合AB INITIO方法的性能。 G4和G4(MP2)复合方法显示出相对较差的性能,具有8.7和6.3的根均方偏差(RMSD),为8.7和6.3

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号