...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Dermato-Venereologica >Evaluation of systemic provocation tests in patients with suspected allergic and pseudoallergic drug reactions (see comments)
【24h】

Evaluation of systemic provocation tests in patients with suspected allergic and pseudoallergic drug reactions (see comments)

机译:对疑似过敏和假过敏药物反应患者的全身激发试验的评估(请参阅评论)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In order to examine the diagnostic value of systemic provocation tests, we studied 56 inpatients hospitalized for identification of the agent eliciting previous severe allergic or pseudoallergic reactions to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, local anaesthetics or antibiotics. Skin tests were positive in only 4 patients reacting to antibiotics and propyphenazone and were always negative for local anaesthetics (n = 32). Only 4 of 26 patients reacted to oral or subcutaneous provocation, 3 times to penicillin and once each to mepivacain, propyphenazone and cyanocobalamine when the suspected drug was tested. In the remaining 30 patients, who for safety reasons were tested only with alternative drugs, none had positive reactions, but 11 patients reported non-specific symptoms, as did 9 of 21 patients given placebo. Systemic provocation tests for drug allergy thus gave few positive results. However, these tests should always be done together with placebo testing for validation of results, and they remain indispensable for identification of alternative, well-tolerated drugs.
机译:为了检查系统性激发试验的诊断价值,我们研究了56名住院患者的住院情况,以鉴定引起非甾体抗炎药,局部麻醉药或抗生素引起严重过敏或假性过敏反应的药物。仅有4名对抗生素和丙氮平有反应的患者的皮肤测试为阳性,而局部麻醉药的阴性率始终为阴性(n = 32)。测试可疑药物时,在26名患者中,只有4名患者对口服或皮下刺激做出反应,对青霉素进行了3次反应,对甲哌卡因,丙氮平和氰钴胺一次进行了反应。其余30位出于安全原因仅使用替代药物进行测试的患者均未出现阳性反应,但11位患者报告了非特异性症状,而21位接受安慰剂的患者中有9位也有反应。因此,针对药物过敏的全身激发试验几乎没有得到积极的结果。但是,这些测试应始终与安慰剂测试一起进行,以验证结果,并且它们对于鉴定替代品,耐受性良好的药物仍然是必不可少的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号