...
首页> 外文期刊>Current Eye Research >Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography versus spectral optical coherence tomography/scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in the diagnosis of glaucoma
【24h】

Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography versus spectral optical coherence tomography/scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in the diagnosis of glaucoma

机译:Cirrus高清光学相干断层扫描与光谱光学相干断层扫描/扫描激光检眼镜在青光眼的诊断中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: This study was performed to compare the positive predictive value of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements obtained using Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) and spectral OCT/scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO) (OPKO/OTI, Miami, FL) in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Methods: A total of 50 eyes of 50 healthy subjects and 60 eyes of 60 subjects with glaucoma were included. All participants underwent RNFL thickness measurement using Cirrus HD-OCT and spectral OCT/SLO on the same day. Average, quadrant, clock-hour RNFL thicknesses, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and sensitivities at fixed specificities (80% and 95%) were calculated for comparison. Results: RNFL thickness as measured by spectral OCT/SLO was greater than that measured using Cirrus HD-OCT (p<0.001). For both the Cirrus HD-OCT and spectral OCT/SLO, the parameter with the largest AUC was average RNFL thickness (0.954 and 0.944, respectively). The AUCs of RNFL thickness for the discrimination of glaucoma did not differ significantly between the devices (p>0.05), with the exception of RNFL thickness in the nasal area (nasal quadrant, clock-hour sectors 3 and 4); in these areas, spectral OCL/SLO yielded greater AUCs than Cirrus HD-OCT (p<0.05). Sensitivities varied similarly to AUCs. Conclusions: RNFL thicknesses measures using Cirrus HD-OCT and spectral OCT/SLO were not interchangeable. The utility of RNFL thickness measurements in the diagnosis of glaucoma was similar for both the devices.
机译:目的:进行这项研究是为了比较使用Cirrus高清晰度光学相干断层扫描技术(Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec,都柏林,加利福尼亚州)和光谱OCT /获得的乳头周围视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)厚度测量值的阳性预测值扫描激光检眼镜(SLO)(OPKO / OTI,迈阿密,佛罗里达州)诊断青光眼。方法:共纳入50名健康受试者的50只眼和60名青光眼受试者的60只眼。所有参加者均在同一天使用Cirrus HD-OCT和光谱OCT / SLO进行了RNFL厚度测量。计算平均值,象限,时钟小时RNFL厚度,接收器工作特性曲线(AUC)下的面积以及固定特异性(80%和95%)下的灵敏度,以进行比较。结果:通过光谱OCT / SLO测量的RNFL厚度大于使用Cirrus HD-OCT测量的RNFL厚度(p <0.001)。对于Cirrus HD-OCT和光谱OCT / SLO,具有最大AUC的参数是平均RNFL厚度(分别为0.954和0.944)。在不同装置之间,用于区分青光眼的RNFL厚度的AUC没有显着差异(p> 0.05),鼻腔区域的RNFL厚度除外(鼻象限,时分3和4)。在这些区域中,光谱OCL / SLO比Cirrus HD-OCT产生更大的AUC(p <0.05)。敏感性与AUC相似。结论:使用Cirrus HD-OCT和光谱OCT / SLO进行RNFL厚度测量不可互换。两种设备的RNFL厚度测量在青光眼诊断中的效用相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号