...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science and Pollution Research >Comparison between manta trawl and in situ pump filtration methods, and guidance for visual identification of microplastics in surface waters
【24h】

Comparison between manta trawl and in situ pump filtration methods, and guidance for visual identification of microplastics in surface waters

机译:Manta Trawl和原位泵过滤方法的比较,以及表面水域中微型玻璃视觉鉴定的指导

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Owing to the development and adoption of a variety of methods for sampling and identifying microplastics, there is now data showing the presence of microplastics in surface waters from all over the world. The difference between the methods, however, hampers comparisons, and to date, most studies are qualitative rather than quantitative. In order to allow for a quantitative comparison of microplastics abundance, it is crucial to understand the differences between sampling methods. Therefore, a manta trawl and an in situ filtering pump were compared during realistic, but controlled, field tests. Identical microplastic analyses of all replicates allowed the differences between the methods with respect to (1) precision, (2) concentrations, and (3) composition to be assessed. The results show that the pump gave higher accuracy with respect to volume than the trawl. The trawl, however, sampled higher concentrations, which appeared to be due to a more efficient sampling of particles on the sea surface microlayer, such as expanded polystyrene and air-filled microspheres. The trawl also sampled a higher volume, which decreased statistical counting uncertainties. A key finding in this study was that, regardless of sampling method, it is critical that a sufficiently high volume is sampled to provide enough particles for statistical evaluation. Due to the patchiness of this type of contaminant, our data indicate that a minimum of 26 particles per sample should be recorded to allow for concentration comparisons and to avoid false null values. The necessary amount of replicates to detect temporal or spatial differences is also discussed. For compositional differences and size distributions, even higher particle counts would be necessary. Quantitative measurements and comparisons would also require an unbiased approach towards both visual and spectroscopic identification. To facilitate the development of such methods, a visual protocol that can be further developed to fit different needs is introduced and discussed. Some of the challenges encountered while using FTIR microspectroscopic particle identification are also critically discussed in relation to specific compositions found.
机译:由于开发和采用了各种采样和识别微塑料的方法,现在数据显示来自世界各地的地表水域中的微塑料的存在。然而,这些方法之间的差异妨碍了比较以及迄今为止,大多数研究是定性的,而不是定量的。为了允许微型塑料丰富的定量比较,了解采样方法之间的差异至关重要。因此,在现实的情况下比较了蝠rawl和in in in in滤波泵。所有重复的相同微塑性分析允许评估关于(1)精度,(2)浓度和(3)组合物的方法之间的差异。结果表明,泵比拖网相对于体积提供更高的精度。然而,拖网采样更高的浓度,这似乎是由于海面微层上更有效的颗粒采样,例如膨胀的聚苯乙烯和充气微球。拖网还采样了更高的体积,这减少了统计计数的不确定性。本研究中的一个关键发现是,无论采样方法如何,对足够大的体积被采样至关重要以提供足够的粒子进行统计评估。由于这种类型的污染物的斑块,我们的数据表明应记录每个样本的至少26个粒子以允许浓度比较并避免假空值。还讨论了检测时间或空间差异的必要量。对于组成差异和大小分布,即使是更高的粒子计数也是必需的。定量测量和比较还需要一种无偏见的视觉和光谱鉴定方法。为了促进这些方法的发展,引入并讨论了可以进一步开发以适应不同需求的视觉协议。在使用FTIR微型光谱粒子鉴定的同时遇到的一些挑战也批判于发现的特定组合物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号