...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical reviews in oncology/hematology >Identifying an accurate pre-screening tool in geriatric oncology.
【24h】

Identifying an accurate pre-screening tool in geriatric oncology.

机译:在老年肿瘤学中确定准确的预筛查工具。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The use of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in cancer patients older than 70 is recommended. Three pre-screening instruments have been proposed: the abbreviated comprehensive geriatric assessment (aCGA), the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13), and the Groningen frailty index (GFI). The objective of the study was to identify the most efficient pre-screening tool that accurately determines individuals who may benefit from the entire CGA. A total of 113 elderly cancer patients were assessed by means of the aCGA, VES-13, GFI and the full CGA. The sensitivity, specificity of the three instruments was calculated, using the results from the entire CGA as the gold standard for the GFI and the VES-13. The aCGA was assessed whether each sub-component reliably predicts impairment on each sub-component of the full CGA. The majority of the participants were defined as being at risk of vulnerability: 68.14% had two or more impairments of the CGA or were cognitively impaired. The physical and disability questions are useful, but all other screening instruments miss too many cases.
机译:建议在70岁以上的癌症患者中使用综合老年医学评估(CGA)。已经提出了三种预筛查手段:简短的综合老年医学评估(aCGA),弱势老年人调查(VES-13)和格罗宁根脆弱指数(GFI)。该研究的目的是确定最有效的预筛查工具,该工具可以准确确定可能从整个CGA中受益的人。通过aCGA,VES-13,GFI和完整的CGA对总共113位老年癌症患者进行了评估。使用整个CGA的结果作为GFI和VES-13的金标准,计算了三种仪器的灵敏度,特异性。评估了aCGA,每个子组件是否可靠地预测了完整CGA的每个子组件的损害。大部分参与者被定义为有脆弱性风险:68.14%的CGA有两个或多个障碍或存在认知障碍。身体和残疾问题很有用,但是所有其他筛查工具都错过了太多案例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号