...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied optics >Disparity between online and offline tests in accelerated aging tests of LED lamps under electric stress
【24h】

Disparity between online and offline tests in accelerated aging tests of LED lamps under electric stress

机译:在电应力下加速老化测试中在线和离线测试之间的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The accelerated aging tests under electric stress for one type of LED lamp are conducted, and the differences between online and offline tests of the degradation of luminous flux are studied in this paper. The transformation of the two test modes is achieved with an adjustable AC voltage stabilized power source. Experimental results show that the exponential fitting of the luminous flux degradation in online tests possesses a higher fitting degree for most lamps, and the degradation rate of the luminous flux by online tests is always lower than that by offline tests. Bayes estimation and Weibull distribution are used to calculate the failure probabilities under the accelerated voltages, and then the reliability of the lamps under rated voltage of 220 V is estimated by use of the inverse power law model. Results show that the relative error of the lifetime estimation by offline tests increases as the failure probability decreases, and it cannot be neglected when the failure probability is less than 1%. The relative errors of lifetime estimation are 7.9%, 5.8%, 4.2%, and 3.5%, at the failure probabilities of 0.1%, 1%, 5%, and 10%, respectively. (C) 2016 Optical Society of America
机译:对一种类型的LED灯在电应力下进行了加速老化测试,研究了在线和离线测试中光通量退化的差异。两种测试模式的转换都是通过可调节的交流电压稳定电源实现的。实验结果表明,在线测试中光通量退化的指数拟合对大多数灯具具有较高的拟合度,在线测试中光通量的退化率始终低于离线测试。使用贝叶斯估计和威布尔分布来计算加速电压下的故障概率,然后使用逆功率定律模型估计额定电压为220 V时灯的可靠性。结果表明,离线测试估计寿命的相对误差随着失效概率的降低而增加,而当失效概率小于1%时,则不能忽略。在失效概率分别为0.1%,1%,5%和10%时,寿命估计的相对误差分别为7.9%,5.8%,4.2%和3.5%。 (C)2016美国眼镜学会

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号