...
首页> 外文期刊>Continental Shelf Research: A Companion Journal to Deep-Sea Research and Progress in Oceanography >Tides and mixing in the northwestern East China Sea, Part II: Near-bottom turbulence
【24h】

Tides and mixing in the northwestern East China Sea, Part II: Near-bottom turbulence

机译:东海西北部的潮汐和混合,第二部分:近底湍流

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy e and friction velocity u* was studied in reversing and rotating tidal flows in the East China Sea near the northeastern coast of China using ADV and ADCP measurements. The highest near-bottom dissipation rate on a shallow (19m depth) shelf epsilon(nb)similar to 5 x 10(-5)W/kg was associated with the stronger flooding current of the reversing tide and the lowest epsilon(nb)similar to 10(-7) W/kg with the weaker ebb current. The log-layer (ADCP-based) and the skin-layer (ADV-based) near-bottom estimates of friction velocities, u*((log)) and u*((cor)), showed close correspondence for the reversing tidal flow, but when the tidal vector rotated over a sloping bottom u*((log)) was approximately two times larger than u*((cor)). The inapplicability of the Prandtl-Karman log-layer scaling for energetic rotating flow is considered as the major source for this discrepancy. The classical wall-layer parameterization epsilon(nb) = c(0)u*(3)/kappa zeta with c(0)=1 was found to hold well for the reversing tide, but for rotating flow c(0) = 1.5. The scaling for the dissipation rate, epsilon = c(epsilon)e(tr)/L-tr, used in the turbulent kinetic energy (e(tr)) balance equation requires c(epsilon) = 0.06 for the reversing tide, but c(epsilon) = 0.09 for the rotating flow, where the turbulent scale L-tr = kappa zeta and zeta is the distance from the seafloor. Significant departure from the wall layer parameterization was noted when advection of warm water affected the testing site at a sloping shelf (38 m depth), possibly causing convective mixing in addition to boundary-induced turbulence. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:利用ADV和ADCP测量方法研究了中国东北沿海附近东海逆流和旋转潮汐​​流中湍动能e的耗散率和摩擦速度u *。类似于(5 x 10(-5)W / kg)的浅(19m深度)架子ε(nb)上最高的近底耗散率与反向潮汐的较强洪流和最低的ε(nb)相似到10(-7)W / kg的下降电流。对数层(基于ADCP)和表层(基于ADV)的摩擦速度u *((log))和u *((cor))的近底估计显示了反向潮汐的紧密对应关系但当潮汐矢量在倾斜的底部旋转时,u *((log))大约是u *((cor))的两倍。 Prandtl-Karman对数层缩放不适用于高能旋转流被认为是造成这种差异的主要原因。发现经典壁层参数化epsilon(nb)= c(0)u *(3)/ kappa zeta具有c(0)= 1,可以很好地保持逆向潮流,但对于旋转流c(0)= 1.5 。在湍流动能(e(tr))平衡方程中使用的耗散率的标度epsilon = c(ε)e(tr)/ L-tr,对于逆向潮汐,要求c(ε)= 0.06,但是c旋转流的ε= 0.09,其中湍流比例L-tr = kappa zeta,而zeta是距海底的距离。当温水的平流影响倾斜的架子(38 m深度)处的测试地点时,注意到壁层参数化的显着偏离,除了边界引起的湍流外,还可能引起对流混合。 (C)2007 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号