...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Sustainable Agriculture >Effects of Native Grass Restoration Management on Above- and Belowground Pasture Production and Forage Quality.
【24h】

Effects of Native Grass Restoration Management on Above- and Belowground Pasture Production and Forage Quality.

机译:天然草场恢复管理对地上和地下牧草产量和牧草质量的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Multifunctional agricultural landscapes and the ecosystem services they provide are gaining more attention. One example of this is the reintroduction of native species to cool-season grassland agroecosystems managed for livestock production. While such projects have potential ecological and agronomic benefits, there is little information on how restoration management affects pasture production and quality. The objective of this study was to determine how management to establish native warm-season grasses into temperate pastures affects forage production and quality. We tested this over three years (2004 through 2006) using a field experiment with combinations of disturbance (burning and grazing), soil amendments (ambient, nitrogen, and carbon), and native grass seeding times (fall and spring). We measured aboveground net primary production (ANPP), belowground net primary production (BNPP), and two forage quality parameters--neutral detergent fiber and in vitro neutral detergent fiber digestibility. For ANPP, there was a significant disturbance soil amendment interaction effect in each year, but the nature of the interaction varied by year. In 2005, plots where nitrogen was applied had lower BNPP than carbon and ambient plots. In 2006, burned plots had greater BNPP than grazed plots. For each level of disturbance, over 50% of the variability in the forage quality parameters was attributed to non-management variables, such as season. Our results showed no consistent effect of restoration management on pasture production or quality. They highlight the complexity of grassland agroecosystems and demonstrate the importance of evaluating the variability of treatment effects over time.
机译:多功能农业景观及其提供的生态系统服务越来越受到关注。这方面的一个例子是将本地物种重新引入用于牲畜生产的凉季草原农业生态系统。尽管此类项目具有潜在的生态和农艺效益,但是关于恢复管理如何影响牧场生产和质量的信息很少。这项研究的目的是确定将原生的暖季草种植成温带草场的管理方式如何影响牧草的产量和质量。我们使用干扰(燃烧和放牧),土壤改良剂(环境,氮和碳)和原生草播种时间(秋季和春季)的组合进行了三年(2004年至2006年)的田间试验。我们测量了地上净初级生产(ANPP),地上净初级生产(BNPP)以及两个饲料质量参数-中性洗涤剂纤维和体外中性洗涤剂纤维的消化率。对于ANPP,每年都有显着的扰动土壤改良剂相互作用效应,但是相互作用的性质逐年变化。 2005年,施用氮的地块的BNPP低于碳和环境地块。 2006年,烧毁地块的耕地总产值高于放牧地块。对于每个干扰水平,饲草质量参数中超过50%的可变性归因于非管理变量,例如季节。我们的结果表明,恢复管理对牧场生产或质量没有持续的影响。他们强调了草原农业生态系统的复杂性,并证明了评估处理效果随时间变化的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号