首页> 外文期刊>Journal of skin cancer >Targeted Therapies Compared to Dacarbazine for Treatment of BRAFv600e Metastatic Melanoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
【24h】

Targeted Therapies Compared to Dacarbazine for Treatment of BRAFv600e Metastatic Melanoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

机译:与达卡巴嗪相比靶向治疗BRAFv600e转移性黑素瘤的疗效分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose. Two BRAFv600e targeted therapies, dabrafenib and vemurafenib, have received US approval for treatment of metastatic melanoma in BRAFv600e patients, a mutation that affects -50% of patients. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of BRAF inhibitors and traditional chemotherapy for treatment of metastatic melanoma. Methods. A Markov model was developed using a societal perspective. Transition probabilities were derived from two Phase III registration trials comparing each BRAF inhibitor against dacarbazine. Costs were obtained from literature, national databases, and Medicare fee schedules. Utilities were obtained from published literature. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were run to test the impact of uncertainties.
机译:目的。两种BRAFv600e靶向治疗药物dabrafenib和vemurafenib已获得美国批准用于治疗BRAFv600e患者的转移性黑色素瘤,该突变影响-50%的患者。我们评估了BRAF抑制剂和传统化疗治疗转移性黑色素瘤的成本效益。方法。马尔可夫模型是从社会角度出发发展的。转移概率来自两项III期注册试验,将每种BRAF抑制剂与达卡巴嗪进行了比较。费用是从文献,国家数据库和Medicare费用表中获得的。实用程序可从已发表的文献中获得。运行确定性和概率敏感性分析以测试不确定性的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号