首页> 外文期刊>Journal of skin cancer >Comorbidity Assessment in Skin Cancer Patients: A Pilot Study Comparing Medical Interview with a Patient-Reported Questionnaire
【24h】

Comorbidity Assessment in Skin Cancer Patients: A Pilot Study Comparing Medical Interview with a Patient-Reported Questionnaire

机译:皮肤癌患者的合并症评估:一项医学研究与患者报告问卷的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background. Comorbidities are conditions that occur simultaneously but independently of another disorder. Among skin cancer patients, comorbidities are common and may influence management. Objective. We compared comorbidity assessment by traditional medical interview (MI) and by standardized patient-reported questionnaire based on the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 (ACE-27). Methods. Between September 2011 and October 2013, skin cancer patients underwent prospective comorbidity assessment by a Mohs surgeon (MI) and a radiation oncologist (using a standardized patient-reported questionnaire based on the ACE-27, the PRACE-27). Comorbidities were identified and graded according to the ACE-27 and compared for agreement. Results. Forty-four patients were evaluated. MI and PRACE-27 identified comorbidities in 79.5% and 88.6% (p = 0.12) of patients, respectively. Among 27 comorbid ailments, the MI identified 9.9% as being present, while the PRACE-27 identified 12.5%. When there were discordant observations, PRACE-27 was more likely than MI to identify the comorbidity (OR = 5.4, 95% CI = 2.4-14.4, p < 0.001). Overall comorbidity scores were moderate or severe in 43.2% (MI) versus 59.1% (PRACE-27) (p = 0.016). Limitations. Small sample size from a single institution. Conclusion. Comorbidities are common in skin cancer patients, and a standardized questionnaire may better identify and grade them. More accurate comorbidity assessments may help guide skin cancer management.
机译:背景。合并症是同时发生但与另一种疾病无关的疾病。在皮肤癌患者中,合并症很常见,可能会影响治疗。目的。我们通过传统医学访谈(MI)和基于成人合并症评估27(ACE-27)的标准化患者报告问卷比较了合并症评估。方法。在2011年9月至2013年10月之间,皮肤癌患者接受了Mohs外科医生(MI)和放射肿瘤学家的前瞻性合并症评估(使用基于ACE-27,PRACE-27的标准患者报告问卷)。根据ACE-27对合并症进行了识别和分级,并进行了比较以达成协议。结果。评价了44名患者。 MI和PRACE-27分别在79.5%和88.6%(p = 0.12)的患者中发现了合并症。在27种合并症中,MI鉴定为9.9%,而PRACE-27鉴定为12.5%。当观察到不一致的结果时,PRACE-27比MI更可能识别合并症(OR = 5.4,95%CI = 2.4-14.4,p <0.001)。总体合并症评分为中度或重度,分别为43.2%(MI)和59.1%(PRACE-27)(p = 0.016)。局限性。单个机构的样本量小。结论。合并症在皮肤癌患者中很常见,标准化的调查表可能会更好地对其进行识别和分级。更准确的合并症评估可能有助于指导皮肤癌的治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号