...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of rehabilitation medicine : >Effect of a fibromyalgia rehabilitation programme in warm versus cold climate: A randomized controlled study.
【24h】

Effect of a fibromyalgia rehabilitation programme in warm versus cold climate: A randomized controlled study.

机译:纤维肌痛康复计划在温暖与寒冷气候下的效果:一项随机对照研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: To study the long-term effects on symptoms and physical function of a 4-week rehabilitation programme for patients with fibromyalgia, and to determine whether there are any differences if this programme is applied in a warm or cold climate. Methods: A total of 132 patients with fibromyalgia were randomized to a rehabilitation programme in a warm or cold climate, or to a control group without intervention. Assessments were performed before and after intervention, and after 3 and 12 months. The main outcome measures were pain, measured by tender point count (TPC), and physical function, measured with the 6-min walk test (6MWT). Results: There was no difference in any outcome variables at baseline. Persistent reduction in pain measured by TPC occurred only in the warm climatic setting. Mean difference (95% confidence interval (CI)) in TPC between warm and cold climate groups 1 year after the intervention was -1.7 (-2.9 to -0.5) and between the warm climate and the control group -2.2 (-3.3 to -1.0). Three months after the intervention the mean difference between the warm and cold climate groups in pain distribution (McGill mannequin) was -12 (-20 to -5) and between the warm climate and the control group -11 (-18 to -3). There were comparable improvements in physical function (6MWT) between the 2 intervention groups and the control group. The mean difference (95% CI) in 6MWT 1 year after the intervention between the warm climate and the control group was 33 (7-59) m. The corresponding value between the cold climate and the control group was 29 (3-55) m. Grip Strength (95% CI) was increased by 4.6 kg (2.3-6.4) in the warm climate and by 3.2 kg (0.9-5.5) in the cold climate compared with the control group 1 year after the intervention. Conclusion: A rehabilitation programme for fibromyalgia may have a long-term effect on pain, as measured by TPC and pain distribution, when applied in a warm climatic setting, and may improve physical function regardless of the climatic setting.
机译:目的:研究为期4周的纤维肌痛患者康复计划对症状和身体功能的长期影响,并确定该计划在温暖或寒冷的气候下是否存在差异。方法:将总共132例肌纤维痛患者随机分为温暖或寒冷气候下的康复计划,或无干预的对照组。在干预前后,3个月和12个月后进行评估。主要的预后指标是通过压痛点计数(TPC)进行测量的疼痛,以及通过6分钟步行测试(6MWT)进行测量的身体机能。结果:基线时任何结果变量均无差异。仅在温暖的气候条件下,TPC才能持续减轻疼痛。干预后1年,冷热气候组之间TPC的平均差异(95%置信区间(CI))为-1.7(-2.9至-0.5),温暖气候与对照组之间的平均差异为-2.2(-3.3至- 1.0)。干预后三个月,温暖和寒冷气候组之间疼痛分布的平均差异(McGill人体模型)为-12(-20至-5),温暖气候组与对照组之间的平均差异为-11(-18至-3) 。在两个干预组和对照组之间,身体机能(6MWT)有相当的改善。温暖气候和对照组干预后1年6MWT的平均差异(95%CI)为33(7-59)m。寒冷气候和对照组之间的对应值为29(3-55)m。与干预后1年的对照组相比,在温暖气候下的握力(95%CI)增加了4.6 kg(2.3-6.4),在寒冷气候下增加了3.2 kg(0.9-5.5)。结论:在温暖的气候环境中进行纤维肌痛康复计划可能会通过TPC和疼痛分布对疼痛产生长期影响,并且无论气候环境如何均可改善其身体机能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号