...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : >Peer-to-Peer Milk Donors' and Recipients' experiences and perceptions of donor milk banks
【24h】

Peer-to-Peer Milk Donors' and Recipients' experiences and perceptions of donor milk banks

机译:点对点牛奶捐赠者和接受者对捐赠者牛奶库的经验和看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To explore the intersection of peer-to-peer milk sharing and donor milk banks. Methods: A descriptive survey design containing closed and open-ended questions was used to examine women's perceptions of peer-to-peer milk sharing and milk banking. Closed-ended questions were analyzed using descriptive statistics and conventional qualitative content analysis was used to analyze open-ended responses. Setting: Participants were recruited via the Facebook sites of two online milk-sharing networks (Human Milk 4 Human Babies and Eats on Feet). Participants: Ninety-eight milk donors and 41 milk recipients who had donated or received breast milk in an arrangement that was facilitated via the Internet. Results: One half of donor recipients could not donate to a milk bank because there were no banks local to them or they did not qualify as donors. Other respondents did not donate to a milk bank because they viewed the process as difficult, had philosophical objections to milk banking, or had a philosophical attraction to peer sharing. Most donor respondents felt it was important to know the circumstances of their milk recipients. No recipient respondents had obtained milk from a milk bank; it was recognized that they would not qualify for banked milk or that banked milk was cost prohibitive. Conclusion: Peer-to-peer milk donors and recipients may differ from milk bank donors and recipients in significant ways. Cooperation between milk banks and peer sharing networks could benefit both groups.
机译:目的:探讨点对点牛奶共享和捐助者牛奶银行的交集。方法:采用描述性调查设计,其中包含封闭式和开放式问题,用于检验妇女对点对点牛奶共享和牛奶银行的看法。使用描述性统计数据分析不限成员名额的问题,并使用常规定性内容分析法分析不限成员名额的答案。地点:参与者是通过两个在线牛奶共享网络(“人类牛奶4人类婴儿”和“脚上吃东西”)的Facebook网站招募的。参与者:通过互联网协助安排捐赠或接受母乳的98个牛奶捐赠者和41个牛奶接受者。结果:一半的捐赠者无法向牛奶银行捐款,因为他们本地没有银行,或者他们没有资格成为捐赠者。其他受访者之所以没有捐赠牛奶银行,是因为他们认为此过程很困难,对牛奶银行存有哲学上的异议或对同伴共享具有哲学上的吸引力。大多数捐助者答复者认为了解其牛奶接受者的情况很重要。没有接受调查的受访者从牛奶银行获得牛奶;人们认识到他们不符合储备牛奶的资格,或者储备牛奶的成本高昂。结论:点对点牛奶捐赠者和接受者可能与牛奶银行捐赠者和接受者有很大的不同。牛奶银行和同龄人共享网络之间的合作可使双方受益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号