首页> 外文期刊>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging: JMRI >Repeatability of T1-quantification in dGEMRIC for three different acquisition techniques: two-dimensional inversion recovery, three-dimensional look locker, and three-dimensional variable flip angle.
【24h】

Repeatability of T1-quantification in dGEMRIC for three different acquisition techniques: two-dimensional inversion recovery, three-dimensional look locker, and three-dimensional variable flip angle.

机译:dGEMRIC中T1量化对于三种不同采集技术的可重复性:二维反转恢复,三维外观锁定器和三维可变翻转角。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate the repeatability of the dGEMRIC (delayed gadolinium enhanced MRI of cartilage) method in osteoarthritis-prone knee joints for three different T1 quantification techniques: two-dimensional inversion recovery (2D-IR), three-dimensional Look-Locker (3D-LL), and three-dimensional variable flip angle (3D-VFA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine subjects were examined twice, with a 2-week interval, using all three measurement techniques. Four regions of interest were defined in the central medial and lateral femoral cartilage. The repeatability was evaluated for each measurement technique. For the 3D techniques, the variation between different slices was also evaluated. RESULTS: Repeatability expressed by root-mean-square coefficient of variation (CV(RMS)) showed similar results for 2D-IR and 3D-LL (5.4-8.4%). For 3D-VFA CV(RMS) was higher (9.3-15.2%). Intraclass correlation coefficient showed both 2D-IR and 3D-LL reliability to be moderate, while 3D-VFA reliability was low. Inter-slice CV(RMS) and ICC was of the same magnitude as the repeatability. No clear differences could be interpreted between the condyles. CONCLUSION: Both 2D-IR and 3D-LL perform well in generating repeatable dGEMRIC results, while 3D-VFA results are somewhat inferior. Furthermore, repeatability results in this study are similar to previously published results for healthy subjects. Finally, the positioning of the analyzed images is crucial to generate reliable repeatability results.
机译:目的:评估dGEMRIC(延迟g增强MRI软骨)方法在易发生骨关节炎的膝关节中的三种不同T1量化技术的可重复性:二维反转恢复(2D-IR),三维Look-Locker(3D -LL)和三维可变翻转角(3D-VFA)。材料与方法:使用全部三种测量技术,以2周的间隔对9名受试者进行了两次检查。在股骨中央和外侧定义了四个感兴趣的区域。评价每种测量技术的可重复性。对于3D技术,还评估了不同切片之间的差异。结果:用均方根变异系数(CV(RMS))表示的重复性在2D-IR和3D-LL中显示出相似的结果(5.4-8.4%)。对于3D-VFA,CV(RMS)更高(9.3-15.2%)。类内相关系数显示2D-IR和3D-LL可靠性均中等,而3D-VFA可靠性低。切片间CV(RMS)和ICC的大小与可重复性相同。 the突之间没有明显的区别。结论:2D-IR和3D-LL在产生可重复的dGEMRIC结果方面均表现良好,而3D-VFA结果则稍差。此外,这项研究的可重复性结果与之前发表的健康受试者的结果相似。最后,分析图像的位置对于生成可靠的可重复性结果至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号