首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Avian Biology >Effects of predator landscapes on the evolutionary ecology of rooting, timing and molt by long-distance migrants
【24h】

Effects of predator landscapes on the evolutionary ecology of rooting, timing and molt by long-distance migrants

机译:捕食者景观对长距离迁徙的生根,时间和蜕皮进化生态的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Raptors have long been known to prey on avianmigrants (Rudebeck 1950, 1951, Dekker 1980), andseveral studies estimate significant mortality rates formigrants (Lindstrom 1989, Kerlinger 1989, Mooreet al. 1990, Sillett and Holmes 2002). These findingsamply justify Alerstam and Lindstrom's (1990) identification of safety as one of the prime selective forcesshaping the evolution of avian migration strategies andbehaviour. However, as shown by a survey of recentvolumes on the ecology and evolution of avianmigration, safety has garnered much less interest fromecologists compared to that paid to time and energy,the other selective factors identified by Alerstam andLindstrom. Several contributions in 'Stopover ecologyof Nearctic-Neotropical Migrants' (Moore 2000)briefly consider predation risk, but only one chapterof 17 (by Moore et al. 1995) in 'Ecology andManagement of Neotropical Migratory Birds' (Martinand Finch 1995) even mentions predators. Neither'The Ecology of Migrant Birds' (Rappole 1995) nor theedited volume 'Birds of two worlds: the ecology andevolution of migration' (Greenberg and Marra 2005)devote any attention to the effects of predators onmigrants, though one chapter in the latter documentswhat is known of raptor migrations. That things may bestarting to change is evidenced by the inclusion of apaper directly addressing this topic (Lind and Cresswell2006) in the most recent symposium published onmigration issues, in the J. Orn., as well as by thepublication of several field experiments (Schmaljohannand Dierschke 2004, Pomeroy et al. 2006).
机译:早已知道猛禽会捕食鸟类移民(Rudebeck,1950年,1951年,Dekker,1980年),许多研究估计移民的死亡率很高(Lindstrom 1989年,Kerlinger 1989年,Mooreet等人,1990年,Sillett和Holmes,2002年)。这些发现充分证明了Alerstam和Lindstrom(1990)认为安全是塑造鸟类迁移策略和行为演变的主要选择力量之一。但是,正如最近对鸟类迁徙的生态和进化的调查所显示的那样,与时间和精力所花费的精力(Alerstam和Lindstrom所确定的其他选择因素)相比,生态学家对安全的关注要少得多。在“近洋-新移民迁徙的停顿生态学”(Moore 2000)中有几篇简明地考虑了掠食风险,但在“新迁徙鸟类的生态学和管理”(Martinand Finch 1995)中只有17章中的一章(由Moore等人,1995年)。 。尽管“迁徙鸟类的生态学”(Rappole 1995年)或编辑的“两个世界的鸟类:生态学和迁徙的进化”(Greenberg和Marra 2005年)都没有将注意力放在捕食者对移民的影响上,尽管后者中的一章证明了这一点。已知猛禽迁移。在J. Orn。最近发表的关于移民问题的专题讨论会上,以及最近的一些野外实验的发表(Schmaljohannand Dierschke),都包含了直接针对这一主题的论文(Lind和Cresswell,2006),证明了事情可能会开始发生变化。 2004,Pomeroy等,2006)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号