...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hydrometeorology >Uncertainties, Correlations, and Optimal Blends of Drought Indices from the NLDAS Multiple Land Surface Model Ensemble
【24h】

Uncertainties, Correlations, and Optimal Blends of Drought Indices from the NLDAS Multiple Land Surface Model Ensemble

机译:NLDAS多个陆面模型集合的干旱指数的不确定性,相关性和最佳混合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study analyzed uncertainties and correlations over the United States among four ensemble-mean North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) percentile-based drought indices derived from monthly mean evapotranspiration ET, total runoff Q, top 1-m soil moisture SM1, and total column soil moisture SMT. The results show that the uncertainty is smallest for SM1, largest for SMT, and moderate for ET and Q. The strongest correlation is between SM1 and SMT, and the weakest correlation is between ET and Q. The correlation between ET and SM1 (SMT) is strongest in arid-semiarid regions, and the correlation between Q and SM1 (SMT) is strongest in more humid regions in the Pacific Northwest and the Southeast. Drought frequency analysis shows that SM1 has the most frequent drought occurrence, followed by SMT, Q, and ET. The study compared the NLDAS drought indices (a research product) with the U.S. Drought Monitor (USDM; an operational product) in terms of drought area percentage derived from each product. It proposes an optimal blend of NLDAS drought indices by searching for weights for each index thatminimizes the RMSE between NLDAS andUSDMdrought area percentage for a 10-yr period (2000-09)with a cross validation. It reconstructed a 30-yr (1980-2009) Objective Blended NLDAS Drought Index (OBNDI) and monthly drought percentage. Overall, the OBNDI performs the best with the smallestRMSE, followed by SM1 and SMT. It should be noted that the contribution to OBNDI fromdifferent variables varies with region. So a single formula is probably not the best representation of a blended index. The representation of a blended index using the multiple formulas will be addressed in a future study.
机译:这项研究分析了来自全美国平均水平的四个土地数据同化系统(NLDAS)的百分位数干旱指数在美国的不确定性和相关性,这些指数来自月平均蒸散量ET,总径流Q,土壤中最高1-m的SM1和总柱土壤水分SMT。结果表明,SM1的不确定性最小,SMT的不确定性最大,ET和Q的不确定性中等。SM1和SMT之间的关联性最强,ET和Q之间的关联性最弱。ET和SM1(SMT)的关联性最弱。在干旱-半干旱地区最强,而Q和SM1(SMT)之间的相关性在西北太平洋和东南部较潮湿的地区最强。干旱频率分析表明,SM1干旱发生最频繁,其次是SMT,Q和ET。该研究将NLDAS干旱指数(一项研究产品)与美国干旱监测局(USDM;一种可操作的产品)进行了比较,得出每种产品的干旱面积百分比。通过交叉权衡,通过寻找每个指标的权重以使NLDAS和USDMdrought面积百分比之间的RMSE最小,提出了NLDAS干旱指数的最佳组合。它重建了30年(1980年至2009年)的客观综合NLDAS干旱指数(OBNDI)和每月干旱百分比。总体而言,OBNDI的性能最佳,RMSE最小,其次是SM1和SMT。应当指出,不同变量对OBNDI的贡献随区域而变化。因此,单个公式可能不是混合索引的最佳表示。在以后的研究中将解决使用多个公式表示混合索引的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号