...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hydrometeorology >Evaluating surface water cycle simulated by the australian community land surface model (CABLE) across different spatial and temporal domains
【24h】

Evaluating surface water cycle simulated by the australian community land surface model (CABLE) across different spatial and temporal domains

机译:评估澳大利亚社区陆地表面模型(CABLE)在不同时空范围内模拟的地表水循环

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The terrestrial water cycle in the Australian Community Atmosphere Biosphere Land Exchange (CABLE) model has been evaluated across a range of temporal and spatial domains. A series of offline experiments were conducted using the forcing data from the second Global Soil Wetness Project (GSWP-2) for the period of 1986-95, but with its default parameter settings. Results were compared against GSWP-2 multimodel ensembles and a range of observationally driven datasets. CABLE-simulated global mean evapotranspiration (ET) and runoff agreed well with the GSWP-2 multimodel climatology and observations, and the spatial variations of ET and runoff across 150 large catchments were well captured. Nevertheless, at regional scales it underestimated ET in the tropics and had some significant runoff errors. The model sensitivity to a number of selected parameters is further examined. Results showed some significant model uncertainty caused by its sensitivity to soil wilting point as well as to the root water uptaking efficiency and canopy water storage parameters. The sensitivity was large in tropical rain forest and midlatitude forest regions, where the uncertainty caused by the model parameters was comparable to a large part of its difference against the GSWP-2 multimodel mean. Furthermore, the discrepancy among the CABLE perturbation experiments caused by its sensitivity to model parameters was equivalent to about 20%-40% of the intermodel difference among the GSWP-2 models, which was primarily caused by different model structure/processes. Although such results are model dependent, they suggest that soil/vegetation parameters could be another source of uncertainty in estimating global surface energy and water budgets.
机译:澳大利亚社区大气生物圈土地交换(CABLE)模型中的陆地水循环已在一系列时空范围内进行了评估。使用来自第二个全球土壤湿润计划(GSWP-2)的1986-95年期间的强迫数据进行了一系列离线实验,但使用默认参数设置。将结果与GSWP-2多模型合奏和一系列观察驱动的数据集进行了比较。电缆模拟的全球平均蒸散量(ET)和径流与GSWP-2多模型气候学和观测结果非常吻合,并且很好地捕获了150个大流域的ET和径流的空间变化。然而,在区域尺度上,它低估了热带地区的ET,并且存在一些明显的径流误差。进一步检查了模型对许多选定参数的敏感性。结果表明,模型对土壤枯萎点的敏感性以及对根系吸水效率和冠层贮水参数的敏感性导致了一些明显的模型不确定性。在热带雨林和中纬度森林地区,灵敏度很高,其中模型参数引起的不确定性与GSWP-2多模型平均值的大部分差异相当。此外,CABLE对模型参数的敏感性引起的摄动实验之间的差异,相当于GSWP-2模型之间模型间差异的20%-40%,这主要是由不同的模型结构/过程引起的。尽管这些结果与模型有关,但它们表明,土壤/植被参数可能是估计全球表面能和水预算时不确定性的另一个来源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号