...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydrology >In situ measurement of soil moisture: a comparison of techniques
【24h】

In situ measurement of soil moisture: a comparison of techniques

机译:土壤水分原位测量:技术比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A number of automated techniques for point measurement of soil moisture content have been developed to an operational level over the past few decades. While each of those techniques have been individually evaluated by the thermogravimetric (oven drying and weighing) method, typically under laboratory conditions, there have been few studies which have made a direct comparison between the various techniques, particularly under field conditions. This paper makes an inter-comparison of the Virrib(R), Campbell Scientific CS615 reflectometer, Soil Moisture Equipment Corporation TRASE(R) buriable- and connector-type time domain reflectometry (TDR) soil moisture sensors, and a comparison of the connector-type TDR sensor with thermogravimetric measurements for data collected during a 2-year field study. Both qualitative and quantitative comparisons between the techniques are made, and comparisons made with results from a simple water balance 'bucket' model and a Richards equation based model. It was found that the connector-type TDR sensors produced soil moisture measurements within the +/-2.5% v/v accuracy specification of the manufacturer as compared to thermogravimetric data when using the manufacturer's calibration relationship. However, comparisons with the water balance model showed that Virrib and buriable-type TDR sensors yielded soil moisture changes that exceeded rainfall amounts during infiltration events. It was also found that the CS615 reflectometer yielded physically impossible soil moisture measurements (greater than the soil porosity) during periods of saturation. Moreover, the buriable-type TDR measurements of soil moisture content were systematically less than the Virrib measurements by approximately 10% v/v. In addition to the good agreement with thermogravimetric measurements, the connector-type TDR soil moisture measurements yielded the best agreement with Richards equation based model predictions of soil moisture content. with Virrib sensors yielding a poor agreement in the deeper layers. This study suggests that connector-type TDR sensors give the most accurate measurements of soil moisture content out of the sensor types tested. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在过去的几十年中,已经开发了许多用于土壤水分含量点测量的自动化技术。虽然通常在实验室条件下通过热重分析法(烤箱干燥和称量)对每种技术进行了单独评估,但很少有研究直接比较了各种技术,特别是在野外条件下。本文对Virrib(R),Campbell Scientific CS615反射仪,Soil Moisture Equipment Corporation TRASE(R)耐用型和连接器型时域反射仪(TDR)土壤湿度传感器进行了比较,并对连接器进行了比较。 TDR型热重测量传感器,用于在两年的现场研究中收集的数据。进行了技术之间的定性和定量比较,并与简单的水平衡“桶”模型和基于Richards方程的模型的结果进行了比较。已发现,与使用制造商的校准关系的热重数据相比,连接器型TDR传感器产生的土壤水分测量值在制造商的+/- 2.5%v / v精度规范内。但是,与水平衡模型的比较表明,Virrib和Buriable型TDR传感器产生的土壤水分变化在入渗事件期间超过降雨量。还发现,CS615反射仪在饱和期间无法进行土壤水分测量(大于土壤孔隙度)。此外,土壤湿度的可烘烤型TDR测量值比Virrib测量值系统地减少了约10%v / v。除了与热重法测量具有良好的一致性外,连接器型TDR土壤湿度测量值与基于Richards方程的土壤水分含量模型预测值也具有最佳一致性。使用Virrib传感器时,在较深的层中一致性较差。这项研究表明,连接器型TDR传感器可以对所测试的传感器类型中的土壤水分含量进行最准确的测量。 (C)2004 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号