...
【24h】

A narrative review of dexterity assessments.

机译:灵活性评估的叙述性回顾。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

NARRATIVE REVIEW: This article is a narrative review of the psychometric properties (reliability and validity) and other characteristics (cost, time to administer, and year of publication) of commercially available manual and finger dexterity assessments used for adults in the United States. Complete research articles related to dexterity assessments were gathered from online database searches and individually critiqued for scientific rigor based on reliability and validity. Articles relating to 14 dexterity assessments were reviewed. All but three tools had established reliability, seven tools had all five forms of validity established, and two had only face and content validity. The results of this review provide information to those interested in fine motor skill acquisition, impairment, or functional recovery after injury. Therapists may use this information to choose the best assessment instrument to evaluate a patient's recovery of function over time. This review adds to the evidence-based, best-practice literature related to assessment and outcome measurements of patients with limited dexterity function participating in rehabilitation.
机译:叙述性评论:本文是对美国成年人使用的市售手册和手指灵巧性评估的心理计量学特性(可靠性和有效性)和其他特征(成本,施药时间和出版年份)的叙述性评论。从在线数据库搜索中收集了与灵活性评估相关的完整研究文章,并根据信度和效度对科学严谨性进行了单独的批评。审查了与14项灵活性评估有关的文章。除三个工具外,所有工具均已建立可靠性,七个工具已建立所有五种形式的有效性,其中两个工具仅具有面部和内容有效性。审查的结果为那些对精细运动技能习得,损伤或受伤后功能恢复感兴趣的人提供信息。治疗师可以使用此信息来选择最佳的评估工具,以评估患者随着时间的推移功能恢复情况。这项审查增加了基于证据的,最佳实践的文献,与灵活性有限的患者参加康复的评估和结果测量有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号