...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of glaucoma >Detection of glaucoma by spectral domain-scanning laser ophthalmoscopy/optical coherence tomography (SD-SLO/OCT) and time domain optical coherence tomography.
【24h】

Detection of glaucoma by spectral domain-scanning laser ophthalmoscopy/optical coherence tomography (SD-SLO/OCT) and time domain optical coherence tomography.

机译:通过光谱域扫描激光检眼镜/光学相干断层扫描(SD-SLO / OCT)和时域光学相干断层扫描来检测青光眼。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between time-domain and spectral domain-scanning laser ophthalmoscopy/optical coherence tomography (SD-SLO/OCT), and to compare the ability of these methods to detect glaucoma. METHODS: Forty-nine glaucoma and 43 healthy participants were imaged by SD-SLO/OCT and Stratus OCT. Bland-Altman plots were used to compare the measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness. Areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUCs), including the average thickness, thickness in each of the 4 quadrants, and thickness at each of the 12 clock-hours were compared. Sensitivity and specificity of normative classification of the 2 OCTs for detection of glaucoma were calculated. RESULTS: The Bland-Altman plot showed good agreement between the 2 instruments. In eyes with glaucoma, RNFL thickness was greater when measured by SD-SLO/OCT than Stratus OCT in most sectors of the eye (Average RNFL thickness: SD-SLO/OCT, 82.7+/-15.3 mum; Stratus OCT, 76.9+/-18.4 mum; P<0.001). However, the differences between 2 OCTs were not significant in healthy participants. The AUCs of average RNFL measurements for discrimination of glaucoma did not differ significantly between the instruments (SD-SLO/OCT, 0.969; Stratus OCT, 0.959; P=0.535). SD-SLO/OCT showed similar sensitivity (57.1%) with Stratus OCT (53.4%) for detection of glaucoma in normative classification of average RNFL thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Both OCT technologies did well in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Although there were small differences in the 2 instruments in measured RNFL thickness of glaucomatous eyes, in general there was good agreement between the 2 OCTs. SD-SLO/OCT classified more glaucomatous eyes as abnormal based on its normative database.
机译:目的:评估时域和光谱域扫描激光检眼镜/光学相干断层扫描(SD-SLO / OCT)之间的关系,并比较这些方法检测青光眼的能力。方法:通过SD-SLO / OCT和Stratus OCT对49例青光眼和43名健康受试者进行成像。使用Bland-Altman图来比较视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)厚度的测量值。比较了接收器工作特性曲线(AUC)下的面积,包括平均厚度,4个象限中每个象限的厚度以及12个时钟小时中每个时刻的厚度。计算了用于检测青光眼的2种OCT规范分类的敏感性和特异性。结果:Bland-Altman图显示了两种仪器之间的良好一致性。在青光眼中,通过SD-SLO / OCT测量的RNFL厚度在大多数眼部均比Stratus OCT大(平均RNFL厚度:SD-SLO / OCT,82.7 +/- 15.3毫米; Stratus OCT,76.9 + / -18.4妈妈; P <0.001)。但是,在健康参与者中,两次OCT之间的差异并不显着。在两种仪器之间,用于区分青光眼的平均RNFL测量值的AUC没有显着差异(SD-SLO / OCT为0.969; Stratus OCT为0.959; P = 0.535)。在平均RNFL厚度的规范分类中,SD-SLO / OCT对青光眼的检测具有与Stratus OCT(53.4%)相似的灵敏度(57.1%)。结论:两种OCT技术在青光眼的诊断中均表现良好。尽管两种仪器在测量青光眼的RNFL厚度方面差异很小,但总体而言,两种OCT之间有很好的一致性。 SD-SLO / OCT根据其规范数据库将更多的青光眼分类为异常眼。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号