...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition >Polarity Correspondence in Metaphor Congruency Effects: Structural Overlap Predicts Categorization Times for Bipolar Concepts Presented in Vertical Space
【24h】

Polarity Correspondence in Metaphor Congruency Effects: Structural Overlap Predicts Categorization Times for Bipolar Concepts Presented in Vertical Space

机译:隐喻一致性效应中的极性对应:结构重叠预测垂直空间中出现的双极性概念的分类时间

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Previous research has shown that words presented on metaphor congruent locations (e.g., positive words UP on the screen and negative words DOWN on the screen) are categorized faster than words presented on metaphor incongruent locations (e.g., positive words DOWN and negative words UP). These findings have been explained in terms of an interference effect: The meaning associated with UP and DOWN vertical space can automatically interfere with the categorization of words with a metaphorically incongruent meaning. The current studies test an alternative explanation for the interaction between the vertical position of abstract concepts and the speed with which these stimuli are categorized. Research on polarity differences (basic asymmetries in the way dimensions are processed) predicts that +polar endpoints of dimensions (e.g., positive, moral, UP) are categorized faster than -polar endpoints of dimensions (e.g., negative, immoral, DOWN). Furthermore, the polarity correspondence principle predicts that stimuli where polarities correspond (e.g., positive words presented UP) provide an additional processing benefit compared to stimuli where polarities do not correspond (e.g., negative words presented UP). A meta-analysis (Study 1) shows that a polarity account provides a better explanation of reaction time patterns in previous studies than an interference explanation. An experiment (Study 2) reveals that controlling for the polarity benefit of +polar words compared to -polar words did not only remove the main effect of word polarity but also the interaction between word meaning and vertical position due to polarity correspondence. These results reveal that metaphor congruency effects should not be interpreted as automatic associations between vertical locations and word meaning but instead are more parsimoniously explained by their structural overlap in polarities.
机译:先前的研究表明,比喻在隐喻不一致的位置(例如,正面单词DOWN和否定单词UP)上呈现的单词(例如,在屏幕上的正面单词UP和在屏幕上的否定单词DOWN)比在隐喻不一致的位置上呈现的单词(例如,正面单词DOWN和否定单词UP)的分类速度更快。这些发现是通过干扰效应来解释的:与UP和DOWN垂直空间相关的含义会自动干扰具有隐喻不一致含义的单词分类。当前的研究对抽象概念的垂直位置与这些刺激的分类速度之间的相互作用测试了另一种解释。对极性差异(尺寸处理方式中的基本不对称性)的研究预测,尺寸的+极性端点(例如,正面,道德,向上)的分类速度比-尺寸的极性端点(例如,负面,不道德的,向下)更快。此外,极性对应原理预测,与极性不对应(例如,否定词表示)的刺激相比,极性对应(例如,正项表示UP)的刺激提供了额外的处理益处。荟萃分析(研究1)表明,与干扰解释相比,极性描述在以前的研究中提供了对反应时间模式的更好解释。实验(研究2)表明,控制+极性词相对于-极性词的极性好处,不仅消除了词极性的主要影响,而且消除了由于极性对应而引起的词义与垂直位置之间的相互作用。这些结果表明,隐喻全等效应不应被解释为垂直位置和词义之间的自动关联,而应由其极性的结构重叠来更简洁地解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号