...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of environmental monitoring: JEM >Interlaboratory evaluation of endotoxin analyses in agricultural dusts-comparison of LAL assay and mass spectrometry
【24h】

Interlaboratory evaluation of endotoxin analyses in agricultural dusts-comparison of LAL assay and mass spectrometry

机译:农业粉尘中内毒素分析的实验室间评估-LAL分析和质谱的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Endotoxin exposure is associated with wheeze and asthma morbidity,while early life exposure may reduce risk of allergy and asthma. Unfortunately,it is difficult to compare endotoxin results from different laboratories and environments. We undertook this study to determine if lipopolysaccharide (LPS) extraction efficiency could account for differences among laboratories. We generated and collected aerosols from chicken and swine barns,and corn processing. We randomly allocated side-by-side filter samples to five laboratories for Limulus assay of endotoxin. Lyophilized aliquots of filter extracts were analyzed for 3-hydroxy fatty acids (3-OHFAs) as a marker of LPS using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. There were significant differences in endotoxin assay and GC-MS (LPS) results between laboratories for all dust types (p < 0.01). Patterns of differences between labs varied by dust type. Relationships between assay and GC/MS results also depended on dust type. The percentages of individual 3-OHFA chain lengths varied across labs (p < 0.0001) suggesting that each lab recovered a different fraction of the LPS available. The presence of large amounts of particle associated LPS and absence of a freezing thawing cycle were associated with lower correlations between LPS and bioactivity,consistent with an absence of Limulus response to cell-bound endotoxin. These data suggest that extraction methods affect endotoxin measurements. The LAL methods may be most suitable when comparing exposures within similar environments;GC-MS offers additional information helpful in optimizing sample treatment and extraction. GC-MS may be of use when comparing across heterogeneous environments and should be considered for inclusion in future studies of human health outcomes.
机译:内毒素暴露与哮喘和哮喘的发病率有关,而早期暴露可以降低过敏和哮喘的风险。不幸的是,很难比较来自不同实验室和环境的内毒素结果。我们进行了这项研究,以确定脂多糖(LPS)提取效率是否可以解释实验室之间的差异。我们从鸡和猪的仓房以及玉米加工中产生并收集了气溶胶。我们将并排的过滤器样品随机分配到五个实验室进行Li内毒素检测。使用气相色谱-质谱法分析过滤器提取物的冻干等分试样中的3-羟基脂肪酸(3-OHFAs),作为LPS的标志物。所有类型的粉尘实验室之间的内毒素测定和GC-MS(LPS)结果存在显着差异(p <0.01)。实验室之间的差异模式因灰尘类型而异。分析与GC / MS结果之间的关系也取决于粉尘类型。在各个实验室中,各个3-OHFA链长的百分比不同(p <0.0001),这表明每个实验室回收的LPS的比例不同。 LPS与生物活性之间的相关性较低,这与大量颗粒相关的LPS的存在和冷冻解冻周期的缺乏相关,而Limulus对细胞结合的内毒素没有反应。这些数据表明提取方法会影响内毒素的测量。当比较相似环境中的暴露时,LAL方法可能是最合适的; GC-MS提供了有助于优化样品处理和提取的其他信息。在跨异构环境中进行比较时,GC-MS可能会有用,应该考虑将其纳入未来人类健康结果研究中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号