...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Phycology >High rate algal pond operating strategies for urban wastewater nitrogen removal
【24h】

High rate algal pond operating strategies for urban wastewater nitrogen removal

机译:高速率藻池操作策略用于城市污水脱氮

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two experimental high rate algal ponds (HRAPs) (I.5 m~2, 570 L per unit), each with a secondary clarifier for algal biomass separation (0.025 m~2, without recirculation), were fed with urban wastewater for a one-year period (June 1993 to July 1994). The HRAPs were installed on the roof of the Department of Hydraulic, Coastal and Environmental Engineering of the Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain (lat. 41 deg 24 min 42 sec N; long. 2 deg 7 min 42 sec E). Nitrogen removal efficiency and changes in total nitrogen, total organic nitrogen, NH_4~+-N, and oxidized nitrogen under different hydraulic retention times (HRTs) were compared. HRAP A was always operated at a higher HRT than HRAP B. Both HRAPs were subjected to the same environmental conditions of solar radiation, air temperature and influent water quality. Grab samples of influent, effluent of the HRAP (mixed liquor) and final effluent from the clarifiers were taken once a week. The annual average nitrogen removal was 73% for HRAP A, and 57% for HRAP B. Higher removal in HRAP A was due to a lower inorganic nitrogen concentration in its effluent. Significant differences (p < 0.05) in the relative proportions of nitrogen forms between the two HRAPs were observed only in autumn and winter. This was mainly because HRAP B did not achieve a high level of NH_4~+-N removal by stripping and algal uptake, as observed in HRAP A. NH_4~+-N stripping was the most important mechanism for nitrogen removal (mean efficiency of 47% and 32% in HRAP A and B, respectively) followed by algal uptake, and subsequent algal separation in the clarifiers (mean efficiency of 26% and 25% in HRAP A and B respectively). The conclusion of this study is that HRT determines both the nitrogen removal efficiency and the distribution of nitrogen forms in the effluent of a HRAP. The nitrogen removal level can be controlled through suitable HRT operating strategies. By operating at a HRT of 4 days in spring and summer, and 10 days in autumn and winter, nitrogen concentration in the effluent of a HRAP system can be reduced to less than 15 mg L~(-1) N.
机译:向两个实验性高速率藻类池(HRAP)(I.5 m〜2,每单位570 L)供水,其中每个池都配有用于藻类生物质分离的二级澄清池(0.025 m〜2,无需再循环)。年(1993年6月至1994年7月)。 HRAP安装在西班牙巴塞罗那的加泰罗尼亚技术大学的液压,海岸和环境工程系的屋顶上(北纬41度24分42秒;东经2度7分42秒E)。比较了不同水力停留时间(HRT)下氮的去除效率以及总氮,总有机氮,NH_4〜+ -N和氧化氮的变化。 HRAP A始终在比HRAP B高的HRT下运行。两个HRAP都受到太阳辐射,空气温度和进水水质的相同环境条件的影响。每周一次采集进水,HRAP(混合液)的出水和来自澄清池的最终出水的样品。 HRAP A的年平均氮去除率为73%,HRAP B的年平均氮去除率为57%。HRAPA的去除率较高是由于其流出物中的无机氮浓度较低。仅在秋季和冬季,才观察到两种HRAP之间氮形态相对比例的显着差异(p <0.05)。这主要是因为HRAP B不能像HRAP A那样通过汽提和藻类吸收实现高水平的NH_4〜+ -N去除。NH_4〜+ -N汽提是去除氮的最重要机制(平均效率为47分别在HRAP A和HRAP中分别去除了50%和32%的藻类,然后在澄清池中分离了藻类(在HRAP A和B中分别去除了26%和25%的平均效率)。这项研究的结论是,HRT决定了HRAP废水中的脱氮效率和氮形态的分布。脱氮水平可以通过合适的HRT操作策略进行控制。通过在春季和夏季分别为4天和秋季和冬季分别为10天和9天的HRT运行,可以将HRAP系统出水中的氮浓度降低到15 mg L〜(-1)N以下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号