首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Computational Physics >Comparison between Lagrangian and mesoscopic Eulerian modelling approaches for inertial particles suspended in decaying isotropic turbulence
【24h】

Comparison between Lagrangian and mesoscopic Eulerian modelling approaches for inertial particles suspended in decaying isotropic turbulence

机译:拉格朗日和介观欧拉建模方法对各向同性湍流中悬浮的惯性粒子的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the accuracy of the mesoscopic approach proposed by Fevrier et al. [P. Fevrier, O. Simonin, K.D. Squires, Partitioning of particle velocities in gas-solid turbulent flows into a continuous field and a spatially uncorrelated random distribution: theoretical formalism and numerical study, J. Fluid Mech. 533 (2005) 1-46] by comparison against the Lagrangian approach for the simulation of an ensemble of non-colliding particles suspended in a decaying homogeneous isotropic turbulence given by DNS. The mesoscopic Eulerian approach involves to solve equations for a few particle PDF moments: number density, mesoscopic velocity, and random uncorrelated kinetic energy (RUE), derived from particle flow ensemble averaging conditioned by the turbulent fluid flow realization. In addition, viscosity and diffusivity closure assumptions are used to compute the unknown higher order moments which represent the mesoscopic velocity and RUE transport by the uncorrelated velocity component. A detailed comparison between the two approaches is carried out for two different values of the Stokes number based on the initial fluid Kolmogorov time scale, St(K) = 0.17 and 2.2. In order to perform reliable comparisons for the RUE local instantaneous distribution and for the mesoscopic kinetic energy spectrum, the error due to the computation method of mesoscopic quantities from Lagrangian simulation results is evaluated and minimized. A very good agreement is found between the mesoscopic Eulerian and Lagrangian predictions for the small particle Stokes number case corresponding to the smallest particle inertia. For larger particle inertia, a bulk viscous term is included in the mesoscopic velocity governing equation to avoid spurious spatial oscillation that may arise due to the inability of the numerical scheme to resolve sharp number density gradients. As a consequence, for St(K) = 2.2, particle number density and RUE spatial distribution predicted by the mesoscopic Eulerian approach are more smooth with respect to the ones measured from the Lagrangian simulations results. Similarly, the Eulerian approach underestimates the mesoscopic kinetic energy for the high wavenumber modes while the agreement remains very good for the low wavenumber modes. For both cases, the mesoscopic Eulerian approach provides a good prediction of the time dependent particle and fluid-particle velocity correlations measured by spatial averaging in the whole computational domain. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:本文的目的是评估Fevrier等人提出的介观方法的准确性。 [P. Fevrier,O.Simonin,K.D.乡绅,气固湍流中的颗粒速度分配进入一个连续的领域和空间不相关的随机分布:理论形式主义和数值研究,流体力学。 533(2005)1-46]与拉格朗日方法进行比较,以模拟DNS给出的均质各向同性湍流中悬浮的非碰撞粒子的整体。介观欧拉方法涉及求解几个粒子PDF矩的方程:数密度,介观速度和随机不相关动能(RUE),其由湍流实现的条件下的粒子流集合平均得出。另外,使用粘度和扩散率封闭假设来计算未知的高阶矩,这些矩代表介观速度和RUE通过不相关速度分量的传输。基于初始流体Kolmogorov时间尺度St(K)= 0.17和2.2,针对斯托克斯数的两个不同值对两种方法进行了详细的比较。为了对RUE局部瞬时分布和介观动能谱进行可靠的比较,对拉格朗日模拟结果的介观量计算方法造成的误差进行了评估,并将其最小化。在对应最小粒子惯性的小粒子斯托克斯数情形的介观欧拉和拉格朗日预测之间找到了很好的一致性。对于较大的粒子惯性,在介观速度控制方程式中包含一个整体粘性项,以避免由于数值方案无法解析陡峭的数字密度梯度而可能出现的虚假空间振荡。结果,对于St(K)= 2.2,通过介观欧拉方法预测的粒子数密度和RUE空间分布相对于从拉格朗日模拟结果测量的粒子数密度和RUE空间分布更为平滑。同样,欧拉方法低估了高波数模式的介观动能,而对于低波数模式则一致性仍然很好。对于这两种情况,介观欧拉方法都可以很好地预测时间依赖性粒子和流体粒子速度的相关性,这些相关性是通过在整个计算域中进行空间平均来测量的。 (C)2008 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号