首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical neuroscience: official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia >Anesthetic and analgesic effects in patients undergoing a lumbar laminectomy of spinal, epidural or a combined spinal-epidural block with the addition of morphine
【24h】

Anesthetic and analgesic effects in patients undergoing a lumbar laminectomy of spinal, epidural or a combined spinal-epidural block with the addition of morphine

机译:腰椎椎板切除术,硬膜外或联合硬脊膜硬膜外阻滞加吗啡的患者的麻醉和镇痛作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study was designed to evaluate the anesthetic, analgesic and side effects of spinal, epidural and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia with the addition of morphine for lumbar laminectomy. A total of 66 patients undergoing lumbar laminectomy were included in the present study of whom 64 completed the study. Patients were randomly divided into three groups: (i) spinal anesthesia - the SA group; (ii) epidural anesthesia - the EA group; and (iii) combined spinal-epidural anesthesia - the CA group. Demographical data, surgical times and peak sensory levels of groups were similar. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and peripheral oxygen saturation did not differ between the three groups. No differences were observed intraoperatively in Ramsey sedation scale (RSS) scores between the groups, but postoperatively, although RSS scores were similar for the EA and CA groups, they were significantly lower for the SA group. The postoperative visual analogue scale pain scores were higher in the SA group compared to the EA and the CA groups except for the second postoperative hour. Time-to-use of the first patient controlled analgesia was similar for all groups. The total consumption of morphine over the 24-hour study period was significantly higher in the SA group compared to the EA and the CA groups. Postoperative nausea and vomiting frequencies were higher in SA group, but pruritus frequency was lower than the EA and the CA groups. In conclusion, although spinal, epidural, and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia are adequate and effective for lumbar laminectomies, epidural and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia techniques are more effective than spinal anesthesia for postoperative analgesia and sedation with lesser side effects.
机译:这项研究旨在评估腰椎椎板切除术中脊髓,硬膜外和脊髓硬膜外联合麻醉与吗啡的麻醉,镇痛和副作用。本研究共纳入66位接受腰椎椎板切除术的患者,其中64位完成了研究。将患者随机分为三组:(i)脊髓麻醉-SA组; (ii)硬膜外麻醉-EA组; (iii)脊髓-硬膜外联合麻醉-CA组。各组的人口统计学数据,手术时间和最高感觉水平相似。三组之间的心率,平均动脉压和外周血氧饱和度没有差异。两组之间的术中Ramsey镇静量表(RSS)评分无差异,但术后,尽管EA和CA组的RSS评分相似,但SA组的RSS评分明显较低。除术后第二个小时外,SA组的术后视觉模拟量表疼痛评分高于EA和CA组。所有组中首例患者自控镇痛的使用时间均相似。与EA和CA组相比,SA组在24小时研究期内的吗啡总消费量显着更高。 SA组术后恶心和呕吐频率较高,但瘙痒频率低于EA和CA组。总之,尽管脊柱,硬膜外和脊柱-硬膜外联合麻醉对于腰椎切除术是足够和有效的,但硬膜外和脊柱-硬膜外联合麻醉技术在术后镇痛和镇静方面比脊椎麻醉更有效,且副作用较小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号