...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical neuroscience: official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia >Asleep-awake-asleep craniotomy: A comparison with general anesthesia for resection of supratentorial tumors
【24h】

Asleep-awake-asleep craniotomy: A comparison with general anesthesia for resection of supratentorial tumors

机译:睡醒清睡颅骨切开术:与全麻切除幕上肿瘤的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The anesthetic plan for patients undergoing awake craniotomy, when compared to craniotomy under general anesthesia, is different, in that it requires changes in states of consciousness during the procedure. This retrospective review compares patients undergoing an asleep-awake-asleep technique for craniotomy (group AW: n = 101) to patients undergoing craniotomy under general anesthesia (group AS: n = 77). Episodes of desaturation (AW = 31% versus AS = 1%, p < 0.0001), although temporary, and hypercarbia (AW = 43.75 mmHg versus AS = 32.75 mmHg, p < 0.001) were more common in the AW group. The mean arterial pressure during application of head clamp pins and emergence was significantly lower in AW patients compared to AS patients (pinning 91.47 mmHg versus 102.9 mmHg, p < 0.05 and emergence 84.85 mmHg versus 105 mmHg, p < 0.05). Patients in the AW group required less vasopressors intraoperatively (AW = 43% versus AS = 69%, p < 0.01). Intraoperative fluids were comparable between the two groups. The post anesthesia care unit (PACU) administered significantly fewer intravenous opioids in the AW group. The length of stay in the PACU and hospital was comparable in both groups. Thus, asleep-awake-asleep craniotomies with propofol-dexmedetomidine infusion had less hemodynamic response to pinning and emergence, and less overall narcotic use compared to general anesthesia. Despite a higher incidence of temporary episodes of desaturation and hypoventilation, no adverse clinical consequences were seen.
机译:与全麻下开颅手术相比,清醒开颅手术患者的麻醉计划有所不同,因为它需要在手术过程中改变意识状态。这项回顾性回顾将接受开颅手术的入睡-清醒-睡眠技术的患者(AW组:n = 101)与在全身麻醉下进行开颅手术的患者(AS组:n = 77)进行了比较。尽管是暂时的,但去饱和发作(AW = 31%vs AS = 1%,p <0.0001)和高碳酸血症(AW = 43.75 mmHg vs AS = 32.75 mmHg,p <0.001)更常见。与AS患者相比,AW患者在施加头夹时平均动脉压显着降低(钉扎91.47 mmHg对102.9 mmHg,p <0.05和84.85 mmHg对105 mmHg,p <0.05)。 AW组的患者术中需要的血管加压药较少(AW = 43%,AS = 69%,p <0.01)。两组之间的术中液体相当。在AW组中,麻醉后护理单位(PACU)的静脉内阿片类药物用量明显减少。两组患者在PACU和医院的住院时间相当。因此,与全身麻醉相比,输注丙泊酚-右美托咪定的入睡-清醒-入睡颅骨切开术对钉扎和脱出的血液动力学反应较少,并且麻醉剂的总体使用量也较少。尽管短暂的脱饱和和通气不足发生率较高,但未见不良临床后果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号