...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical neuroscience: official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia >Use of skin glue versus traditional wound closure methods in brain surgery: A prospective, randomized, controlled study.
【24h】

Use of skin glue versus traditional wound closure methods in brain surgery: A prospective, randomized, controlled study.

机译:脑外科手术中使用皮肤胶与传统伤口闭合方法的比较:一项前瞻性,随机对照研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Traditional skin sutures (TSS) and metal skin clips (SC) are the most common devices utilized for closure of surgical incisions. They are safe and effective, although they require instruments to apply them, are time consuming and, above all, create an extra staff and cost burden for removal of sutures/staples. The ideal incision closure should be simple, effective, safe, rapid, inexpensive, painless, cosmetic and bactericidal. The present study was designed to determine the safety and efficacy of N-butyl octyl cyanoacrylate (NCA) tissue adhesive, a liquid bandage surgical product, for wound closure in brain surgery. Our prospective randomized controlled study compared NCA with traditional methods for wound closure in brain surgery. Over a 6-month period, 40 patients who underwent a supratentorial elective craniotomy were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups. The 20 participants in group A were treated using a new NCA tissue adhesive while the 20 participants in group B were treated using either nylon monofilament, TSS or SC. In the post-operative period and during follow-up, two different nurses (the second nurse was blinded to the closure method used) recorded details regarding wound aspects, complications and patient satisfaction using a modified version of the Hollander Wound Score Scale. We found no difference in the cosmetic outcome of the two groups, or in wound complications rate, but the patient satisfaction score was higher in group A (9.4 vs. 7.1; p<0.005). The mean application time of the tissue adhesive was significantly faster than that of the standard suture (115s vs. 300s; p<0.001); in the skin clips subgroup it was 105s. Our study suggests that the new NCA tissue adhesive is a safe, effective and reliable skin closure for neurosurgical procedures in the supratentorial region; it also achieves optimal cosmetic results, is less time consuming to use and has greater patient satisfaction. However, further studies with a larger number of patients are necessary to corroborate these results.
机译:传统的皮肤缝合线(TSS)和金属皮肤夹(SC)是用于闭合手术切口的最常见设备。它们安全有效,尽管它们需要使用仪器才能使用,而且很费时间,而且最重要的是,这为移除缝合线/订书钉增加了额外的人员和成本负担。理想的切口闭合应简单,有效,安全,快速,廉价,无痛,美观和杀菌。本研究旨在确定氰基丙烯酸正丁酯(NCA)组织粘合剂(一种液体绷带外科产品)在脑外科伤口闭合中的安全性和有效性。我们的前瞻性随机对照研究将NCA与传统的脑外科伤口闭合方法进行了比较。在6个月的时间内,招募了40例行幕上择期开颅手术的患者,并随机分为两组。 A组的20名参与者使用新型NCA组织粘合剂治疗,而B组的20名参与者使用尼龙单丝,TSS或SC进行治疗。在术后和随访期间,两名不同的护士(第二名护士不了解所使用的闭合方法)使用改良版的Hollander伤口评分量表记录了有关伤口方面,并发症和患者满意度的详细信息。我们发现两组的美容结局或伤口并发症发生率均无差异,但A组的患者满意度得分较高(9.4 vs. 7.1; p <0.005)。组织粘合剂的平均施用时间明显快于标准缝线的施用时间(115s对300s; p <0.001)。在皮肤夹子组中为105s。我们的研究表明,新型NCA组织粘合剂对于幕上区域的神经外科手术是一种安全,有效和可靠的皮肤闭合术。它还可以获得最佳的美容效果,使用时间更少,患者满意度更高。但是,有必要对大量患者进行进一步研究以证实这些结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号