...
【24h】

On a recent stickiness criterion using a very simple generalization of DMT theory of adhesion

机译:在最近的粘性标准上,使用DMT粘附理论的非常简单的概括

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the contact of rough surfaces, contact occurs on smaller and smaller scales, the well-known Tabor adhesion parameter decreases and the so-called Derjaguin-Muller-Toporov (DMT) theory is the appropriate limit. Fuller and Tabor developed 40 years ago a model based on asperities and JKR theory, and more recently the author developed an asperity theory using asperities and DMT theory in the form given by Maugis. Both lead to adhesion parameters which do not depend on the range of attractive forces, in contrast to the parameter recently suggested by Pastewka and Robbins (PNAS, 111(9), 3298-3303, 2014). As it is well known from random process theory that contact of rough surfaces can be described reasonably well by asperity summits at least for low bandwidths, the Pastewka-Robbins DMT model and stickiness criterion should correspond in the limit case of a spherical contact. We therefore consider this limit case, and show that Pastewka-Robbins DMT model introduces a dependence on range of attractive forces, or on Tabor parameter, which is not correct for the sphere, and therefore may be incorrect also in general.
机译:在粗糙表面的接触中,接触发生的规模越来越小,众所周知的Tabor附着力参数降低,所谓的Derjaguin-Muller-Toporov(DMT)理论是适当的限制。 Fuller和Tabor于40年前开发了一种基于粗糙和JKR理论的模型,最近,作者以莫吉斯给出的形式,使用粗糙和DMT理论开发了粗糙理论。与Pastewka和Robbins最近提出的参数相反,这两种方法都导致粘附参数不依赖于吸引力的范围(PNAS,111(9),3298-3303,2014)。从随机过程理论众所周知,至少对于低带宽,粗糙表面的接触可以通过粗糙峰来很好地描述,因此在球形接触的极限情况下,Pastewka-Robbins DMT模型和粘性准则应相对应。因此,我们考虑这种极限情况,并表明Pastewka-Robbins DMT模型引入了对吸引力范围或Tabor参数的依赖关系,这对球体是不正确的,因此通常也可能是错误的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号