...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of advanced nursing >Interpreting trauma radiographs.
【24h】

Interpreting trauma radiographs.

机译:解释创伤射线照相。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Many accident and emergency clinicians regard the radiographic image as an extension of the clinical examination, as a provisional diagnosis, based on clinical signs and symptoms, can be confirmed or refuted by inspection of X-rays. However, the value of radiography in this context is not determined by the actual presence of trauma or pathology on the radiograph, but is dependent on the ability of a clinician to identify any trauma or pathology present. Traditionally, the responsibility for interpreting radiographic images within the accident and emergency environment in the United Kingdom (UK) has been with medical clinicians. However, expansion of the nursing role has begun to change the boundaries of professional practice and now many nurses are both requesting and interpreting trauma radiographs. AIM: To ascertain the ability of accident and emergency doctors and nurses to interpret trauma radiographs, and identify whether there is a consistent standard of interpretive accuracy that could be used as a measure of competence. METHODS: A literature review was conducted using the Cochrane Library, Medline and CINAHL databases and the keywords radiographic interpretation, radiographic reporting, accident and emergency and emergencyurse practitioner. FINDINGS: The ability of accident and nursing doctors and nurses to interpret trauma radiographs accurately varies markedly, and no identified published study has established an appropriate level of accuracy that should be achieved in order to demonstrate satisfactory competence in the interpretation of radiographic images. CONCLUSIONS: Determining a measure of interpretive accuracy that can be used to assess ability to interpret radiographic trauma images is fraught with difficulties. Consequently, nurses may attempt to prove their skills by directly comparing their abilities to those of their medical colleagues. However, as a result of marked variation in the ability of senior house officers to interpret trauma radiographs, a similar ability does not automatically imply that a satisfactory level of ability has been achieved.
机译:背景:许多急诊医生将放射线图像视为临床检查的扩展,因为根据临床体征和症状的临时诊断可以通过检查X射线来确认或驳斥。但是,在这种情况下,射线照相的价值并不取决于射线照片上实际存在的创伤或病理,而是取决于临床医生识别存在的任何创伤或病理的能力。传统上,在英国(UK)的事故和紧急情况下解释射线照相图像的责任一直由医学临床医生负责。但是,扩大护理职能已经开始改变专业实践的界限,现在许多护士都在要求和解释创伤X光片。目的:确定事故和急诊医生和护士对创伤X光片的解释能力,并确定是否有一致的解释准确性标准可作为衡量能力的标准。方法:使用Cochrane图书馆,Medline和CINAHL数据库以及射线照相解释,射线照相报告,事故和紧急情况以及急诊/护士的关键词进行文献回顾。结果:事故和护理医生及护士对创伤X光片的准确解释能力差异显着,目前尚无已确定的已发表研究建立适当的准确度水平,以证明其在解释X光片方面具有令人满意的能力。结论:确定一种可用于评估放射线创伤图像解释能力的解释准确性度量标准充满了困难。因此,护士可能试图通过直接将自己的能力与其医务同事的能力进行比较来证明自己的技能。但是,由于高级内务干事解释创伤X光片的能力明显不同,因此类似的能力并不能自动暗示获得了令人满意的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号