...
首页> 外文期刊>Digestive Diseases and Sciences >Palliative stent for malignant colonic obstruction by extracolonic malignancy: A comparison with colorectal cancer
【24h】

Palliative stent for malignant colonic obstruction by extracolonic malignancy: A comparison with colorectal cancer

机译:结肠外恶性恶性结肠梗阻姑息支架:与结直肠癌的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and Aim: Palliative self-expandable metal stent placement for colonic obstruction arising from an extracolonic malignancy might be as useful as that for colorectal cancer, but data are limited. The purposes of this study were to investigate success and complications of stent placement in patients with extracolonic malignancy and to compare long-term clinical outcomes for an extracolonic malignancy group with those for a colorectal cancer group. Patients and methods: We reviewed short-term and long-term outcomes for patients treated with palliative stents for colonic obstruction by extracolonic malignancy (n = 44) or unresectable colorectal cancer (n = 53) from January 2006 to March 2011. Results: Neither the technical success (93.2 vs. 98.1 %, respectively; P = 0.326) nor clinical success (77.3 vs. 84.9 %, respectively; P = 0.433) of stent placement differed significantly in the two groups. Complications as a result of stent placement also differed only slightly in the two groups (perforation: 4.8 % (two cases) vs. 0 %, respectively; migration: 4.8 vs. 5.8 %, respectively, P = 0.343). With regard to long-term outcomes, although stent patency was shorter in the extracolonic malignancy group (P = 0.015), because overall survival in this group was also shorter (P = 0.018), it was sufficient for palliative purposes. Conclusions: Palliative stent placement was equally effective and safe for treatment of colonic obstruction arising from either extracolonic malignancy or unresectable colorectal cancer. Even in cases of colonic obstruction arising from extracolonic malignancy, stent placement should be considered as primary palliative therapy.
机译:背景与目的:姑息性自扩张金属支架置入结肠外恶性肿瘤引起的结肠梗阻可能与结直肠癌一样有用,但数据有限。这项研究的目的是调查结肠外恶性肿瘤患者支架置入术的成功和并发症,并比较结肠外恶性肿瘤组和结直肠癌组的长期临床疗效。患者和方法:我们回顾了2006年1月至2011年3月接受结肠外恶性肿瘤(n = 44)或无法切除的结直肠癌(n = 53)的姑息性支架治疗结肠梗阻患者的短期和长期结果。两组支架置入的技术成功率(分别为93.2%和98.1%; P = 0.326)或临床成功率(分别为77.3%和84.9%; P = 0.433)差异显着。两组中因支架置入引起的并发症也仅略有不同(穿孔:分别为4.8%(两个病例)和0%;迁移:分别为4.8和5.8%,P = 0.343)。关于远期结局,尽管结肠外恶性肿瘤组的支架通畅时间较短(P = 0.015),但由于该组的总生存期也较短(P = 0.018),因此对于姑息治疗而言已足够。结论:姑息性支架置入术对于结肠外恶性肿瘤或无法切除的结直肠癌引起的结肠梗阻治疗同样有效且安全。即使在结肠外恶性肿瘤引起的结肠梗阻的情况下,支架置入也应被视为主要的姑息治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号