...
首页> 外文期刊>HortTechnology >Cover Crop and Floor Management Affect Weed Coverage and Density in an Establishing Oregon Vineyard
【24h】

Cover Crop and Floor Management Affect Weed Coverage and Density in an Establishing Oregon Vineyard

机译:覆盖的作物和地面管理会影响俄勒冈州葡萄园中杂草的覆盖率和密度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Five vineyard floor management treatments were evaluated for effects on weed control over two growing seasons in an establishing 'Chardonnay' (Vitis vinifera) vineyard in the Willamette Valley of Oregon. Four cover crop management treatments and an unplanted treatment were compared to assess the effects on vine row and alleyway weed coverage and densities of broadleaf and grass weeds. A winter annual cover crop was grown in alleyways of the cover-cropped treatments and was mowed in spring. The mowed residue was managed as follows: 1) residue transferred in-row as mulch representing the industry practice of "mow-and-throw," 2) residue transferred in-row as mulch at three times the rate of the earlier treatment, 3) mowed residue incorporated into alleyways, and 4) removal of mowed cover crop residue from the vineyard. Weed coverage was assessed visually within a 1.0-m(2) quadrat placed randomly in alleyways and vine rows, and densities of broadleaf and grass weeds were determined by counting and grouping individual weeds within each quadrat. Vine row weed coverage and densities were lower in treatments with residue mulch at each sampling date in 2009 and 2010, with nearly 100% in-row weed suppression by the heavier mulch treatment. Alleyway weed coverage was lowest when residue was incorporated and highest in the unplanted treatment at some sampling dates. Grass weed densities in alleyways were similar between treatments at all sampling dates. Results of this study indicate that in-row mulch of cover crop residues at fresh weight densities of 2.5-15.0 kg.m(-2) provided effective weed control in a non-irrigated vineyard in western Oregon. Also, alleyway weed coverage may be reduced through incorporation of mowed cover crop residues.
机译:在俄勒冈州威拉米特谷的一个成熟的“霞多丽”(Vitis vinifera)葡萄园中,评估了五个葡萄园地面处理措施对两个生长季节的杂草控制效果。比较了四种覆盖农作物管理处理方法和未种植处理方法,以评估对藤蔓行道和小巷杂草覆盖率以及阔叶和草类杂草密度的影响。在覆盖作物的小巷里种植了一年生的冬季覆盖作物,并在春季进行了修剪。修剪的残留物按以下方式进行管理:1)残留物以行覆盖的方式在行内转移,2)残留物以行覆盖的方式行进,以早期处理速率的三倍,3 )割草残渣并入小巷中,以及4)从葡萄园中清除割草覆盖农作物残渣。目视评估杂草的覆盖范围,将其随机放置在小巷和葡萄树行的1.0-m(2)正交方阵中,并通过对每个正交方中的单个杂草进行计数和分组来确定阔叶和草杂草的密度。在2009年和2010年的每个采样日,采用残留覆盖物的处理中,葡萄行杂草的覆盖率和密度均较低,通过较重覆盖物的处理,行内杂草的抑制率接近100%。当残留物掺入后,巷道杂草覆盖率最低,在某些采样日期未种植处理中,杂草覆盖率最高。在所有采样日期之间,处理之间的小巷杂草密度相似。这项研究的结果表明,在俄勒冈州西部的一个非灌溉葡萄园中,鲜重密度为2.5-15.0 kg.m(-2)的覆盖作物残茬的行覆盖可有效控制杂草。同样,通过合并修剪的覆盖作物残渣可以减少巷道杂草的覆盖率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号